I think it's OK to publish legitimate looking use cases. If we will be swamped with content and PRs then we can revisit the policy.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 8:21 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if anyone has an opinion on what should go into our use cases on > the website. > > http://airflow.apache.org/use-cases/ > > We got a PR to add one more use case and it got me think on what we want > to have there, should we be more picky and get some more 'prominent' cases > (and likely maybe we should somehow vet or even invite companies we want) > or should we allow any 'legitimate looking' use case (and more of them > likely if we start encouraging companies). > > I do not think we ever discussed it. > > Anyone has an opinion ? > > PR here: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462 > > J. >
