Appears to be ... yes... alphabetical. `AAAAMyUseCase` anyone? On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Andrew Godwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd agree too, I don't see how a page absolutely full of real use cases is > a bad thing! > > The only thing that should be considered is a neutral way to order the > entries, I think, so people don't try and push themselves to the top - > unless there's a policy or code for that in place that I've missed. > > Andrew > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:05 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also think it's ok :) >> >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think it's OK to publish legitimate looking use cases. >>> If we will be swamped with content and PRs then we can revisit the >>> policy. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 8:21 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I wonder if anyone has an opinion on what should go into our use cases >>>> on the website. >>>> >>>> http://airflow.apache.org/use-cases/ >>>> >>>> We got a PR to add one more use case and it got me think on what we >>>> want to have there, should we be more picky and get some more 'prominent' >>>> cases (and likely maybe we should somehow vet or even invite companies we >>>> want) or should we allow any 'legitimate looking' use case (and more of >>>> them likely if we start encouraging companies). >>>> >>>> I do not think we ever discussed it. >>>> >>>> Anyone has an opinion ? >>>> >>>> PR here: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462 >>>> >>>> J. >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> +48 660 796 129 >> > -- +48 660 796 129
