I'd agree too, I don't see how a page absolutely full of real use cases is a bad thing!
The only thing that should be considered is a neutral way to order the entries, I think, so people don't try and push themselves to the top - unless there's a policy or code for that in place that I've missed. Andrew On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:05 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I also think it's ok :) > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think it's OK to publish legitimate looking use cases. >> If we will be swamped with content and PRs then we can revisit the policy. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 8:21 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I wonder if anyone has an opinion on what should go into our use cases >>> on the website. >>> >>> http://airflow.apache.org/use-cases/ >>> >>> We got a PR to add one more use case and it got me think on what we want >>> to have there, should we be more picky and get some more 'prominent' cases >>> (and likely maybe we should somehow vet or even invite companies we want) >>> or should we allow any 'legitimate looking' use case (and more of them >>> likely if we start encouraging companies). >>> >>> I do not think we ever discussed it. >>> >>> Anyone has an opinion ? >>> >>> PR here: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462 >>> >>> J. >>> >> > > -- > +48 660 796 129 >
