Kind reminder. One more +1 needed :)
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 1:15 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 4:34 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We need two binding votes from PMC members :) / The status of testing >> is decent, most important and "serious changes" were tested. >> >> J. >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:05 AM Josh Fell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Verified some enhancements/fixes as well as executed several DAGs with the >> > providers included in this release. >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:55 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey all, >> >> >> >> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is >> >> calling a vote on the release, >> >> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Fri 3 >> >> Dec 16:53:29 CET 2021. >> >> >> >> Consider this my (binding) +1. >> >> >> >> Airflow Providers are available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ >> >> >> >> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary >> >> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the >> >> provider packages. >> >> >> >> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary >> >> Python "wheel" release. >> >> >> >> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC >> >> candidates are described in >> >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members >> >> >> >> and for Contributors: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors >> >> >> >> >> >> Public keys are available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS >> >> >> >> Please vote accordingly: >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >> >> >> >> >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are >> >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >> >> >> >> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. >> >> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying >> >> the artifact checksums when we actually release. >> >> >> >> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19895 >> >> >> >> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below >> >> links: >> >> >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/2.5.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-druid/2.1.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hdfs/2.2.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/2.1.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/2.0.2rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/2.2.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/2.1.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/6.2.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-influxdb/1.1.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/3.4.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/2.4.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/3.4.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/2.3.0rc1/ >> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/2.3.1rc1/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> J.
