RE: [DISCUSS] Experimental Prod ARM64 image for 2.3.0 ?

[Eloi Codina]

I also think it would be great enabling experimental ARM images. In my case, I could test Airflow on a small ARM-based server before installing it on our production server.   On 2022/04/13 11:53:32 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey everyone, > > We have a CI image multi-platform image (including ARM64) platform for > a few weeks and - to be perfectly honest - it's heaven and earth > compared to the emulated image. > > Except running tests and supporting mssql and mysql - we **could** if > we want to push a multiplatform image when we release as well. It will > take a while to get proper testing in CI but I am inclined to release > the ARM part of the image as "experimental" support in 2.3.0 even > before we do it and give it in the hands of our users. > > Honestly I don't expect many problems in Airflow - i expect many more > in numpys/pandas and other low-level scientific libraries, and having > no support for MySQL and MSSQL for those images is a good one as we > will remove some of the error-factors from people experimenting with > it. > > That will allow people who work with Mac OS M1s or use newer Raspberry > PIs or simply experiment with migration to ARM based server > infrastructure to test and run "production" Airflow. > > There is a bigger "platform war" gearing up - with cloud providers > ramping up their server side ARM support so we might well - in a year > or two - be in the situation that ARM-based servers are becoming very > popular and people will want to run Airflow there. > > WDYT? > Sent from Mail for Windows