Yeah agreed with QP -- I think we should start with experimental support On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 16:53, Eloi Codina <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also think it would be great enabling experimental ARM images. In my > case, I could test Airflow on a small ARM-based server before installing it > on our production server. > > > > On 2022/04/13 11:53:32 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > > > We have a CI image multi-platform image (including ARM64) platform for > > > a few weeks and - to be perfectly honest - it's heaven and earth > > > compared to the emulated image. > > > > > > Except running tests and supporting mssql and mysql - we **could** if > > > we want to push a multiplatform image when we release as well. It will > > > take a while to get proper testing in CI but I am inclined to release > > > the ARM part of the image as "experimental" support in 2.3.0 even > > > before we do it and give it in the hands of our users. > > > > > > Honestly I don't expect many problems in Airflow - i expect many more > > > in numpys/pandas and other low-level scientific libraries, and having > > > no support for MySQL and MSSQL for those images is a good one as we > > > will remove some of the error-factors from people experimenting with > > > it. > > > > > > That will allow people who work with Mac OS M1s or use newer Raspberry > > > PIs or simply experiment with migration to ARM based server > > > infrastructure to test and run "production" Airflow. > > > > > > There is a bigger "platform war" gearing up - with cloud providers > > > ramping up their server side ARM support so we might well - in a year > > > or two - be in the situation that ARM-based servers are becoming very > > > popular and people will want to run Airflow there. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > >
