+1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great!
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more and > more need from users who want it. > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've >> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry >> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow >> >> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC. >> >> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes implementing >> how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and logs in a >> common open specification called OpenTelemetry (opentelemetry.io). The >> proposal was based on the several POC's that were conducted to test the >> feasibility of the specification. >> >> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better >> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways >> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases. >> >> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the >> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :). >> >> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible, >> >> Howard >> >
