+1 (non-binding), let's do it ! On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen! > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great! >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Big +1 (binding) from me. I took part in preparing it and I see more >>> and more need from users who want it. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:26 PM Howard Yoo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've >>>> caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with OpenTelemetry >>>> Support for Airflow, and I would like to call for a vote on >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow >>>> >>>> The vote will last for 7 business days, until 2022/06/22 at 20:00 UTC. >>>> >>>> To briefly introduce you to this AIP, the proposal describes >>>> implementing how Airflow can be instrumented to emit metrics, traces, and >>>> logs in a common open specification called OpenTelemetry ( >>>> opentelemetry.io). The proposal was based on the several POC's that >>>> were conducted to test the feasibility of the specification. >>>> >>>> Personally I believe this would greatly help Airflow to become better >>>> 'observed' by many different monitoring tools out there, with better ways >>>> to expose and also customize telemetry data for many critical use cases. >>>> >>>> If anyone has any changes you think are fundamental/foundational to the >>>> core idea you have 1 business week to raise it :). >>>> >>>> Thank you for all your help in making this proposal possible, >>>> >>>> Howard >>>> >>>
