As of airflow 2.3, airflow hooks no longer need to name extra fields with
the `extra__conn_type__field_name` convention (PR
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22607).

I believe using the short name is much more intuitive and user-friendly.
So I am currently working on updating our hooks so they can be used without
the prefix (of course maintaining backcompat).  This will achieve
consistency of interface and will make it so users, when following existing
practices to add new custom fields, will not incorrectly think that they
need to use the prefix.

I have opened up a number of PRs doing this for most of them, though there
are a few remaining and work continues.

I just wanted to bring it to the attention of the group for transparency.

Reply via email to