Cool! On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 9:16 PM Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey folks! > > As a follow-up, if you're interested in following along with this project > or even taking some tasks, I've created a dashboard using Github's new > Projects tool. You can see the backlog of tasks, who's assigned, the > estimated size and priority of the task and it's current state: > https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/162/views/7?layout=board > > NOTE: See the README (button in the top right corner) for a more detailed > explanation of the priority and estimate fields (it's frustrating how > hidden the README is for this Projects tool...) > > > This will be a live board, new tasks will be added as they come up, but > the general skeleton is there. > > > Cheers, > Niko > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, November 7, 2022 4:41:44 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [EXTERNAL]Proposal to Remove Executor Coupling in Core > Airlfow Code Base > > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > Hey folks! > > I went ahead and wrote an AIP for this proposal. It can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-51+Removing+Executor+Coupling+from+Core+Airlfow > > Please leave any feedback here or in the Confluence comments. > > Thanks for your time! > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, October 24, 2022 2:28 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Proposal to Remove Executor Coupling in Core > Airlfow Code Base > > > Hey all! > > Recently I have spent some time investigating the occurrences of hardcoded > Executor logic within core Airflow code and put together a mini-AIP of > sorts on Github Discussions (it was nice to use GH markdown and automatic > code snippets). > > I'm particularly interested to hear if folks think an AIP would be > reasonable for this set of changes or if the community is fine with using > Discussions alone and beginning development without an AIP. > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/27241 > > Thanks for you time! > >
