given confirmation of the elasticseach issue https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1625045594 apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.0.0rc2 is excluded from this release. I will cut ad hoc rc3 for this provider once a fix is merged.
RC2 vote continues for the rest of providers. On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:54 AM Pankaj Koti <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > *Change of vote: -1 (non-binding)* > Sorry, I would like to change my vote to *-1 (non-binding) *due to the bug > confirmed by the author in Elasticsearch RC. > > Just saw that the author confirmed that they are able to reproduce this > issue. It is a regression as it used to work fine with > apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch==4.5.1 > > Sorry again for the confusion. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:16 PM Pankaj Koti <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io> > wrote: > > > Hi Elad, > > > > Yes, sorry for the vagueness. I am unsure if it is a bug and there is no > > linked documentation with the PR suggesting a change needed in the > > configuration. > > I am waiting for a response from the author. At the moment, it is a > > regression for me as my previous remote logging setup using Elasticsearch > > is no longer working and the webserver reports errors when it tries to > > fetch logs from the Elasticsearch server whereas I see that logs are > > getting shipped correctly to Elasticsearch. > > > > I would like to cast a *+0 (non-binding) *because a series of other RCs > > mentioned below work fine, it's just Elasticsearch RC waiting for a > > response. > > > > Below RCs work fine: > > > > - apache-airflow-providers-amazon > > - apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive > > - apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy > > - apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes > > - apache-airflow-providers-databricks > > - apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud > > - apache-airflow-providers-google > > - apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure > > - apache-airflow-providers-snowflake > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Pankaj Koti > > > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > Location: Pune, India > > > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > > Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 1:45 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi Pankaj, > >> > >> Troubles is a very vague word :) > >> Does troubles mean regression/blocker bug or maybe this just requires > >> further doc clarification? > >> From the PR comments it's not clear to me if this is just a > >> mis-configuration concern or an actual bug. > >> > >> Please cast a non-binding with explanation of the impact of this RC > >> release > >> (you can change your vote later if new information comes to light) > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 10:33 AM Pankaj Koti > >> <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > I am facing trouble with using the ElasticSearch RC. > >> > The remote logging setup that used to work for me previously is no > >> longer > >> > working with this change. > >> > I have reached out for help on the PR with comment > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1623629476 > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Pankaj Koti > >> > > >> > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > >> > Location: Pune, India > >> > > >> > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > >> > > >> > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > >> > > >> > Mobile: +91 9730079985 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 3:56 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences. verified that > >> the > >> > > sources from the provider"tag" are used for all new providers. > tested > >> my > >> > > change in hive. All looks good > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:43 PM Hussain, Syed > >> <syeda...@amazon.com.invalid > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks Jarek for clarifying 😊 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Did you test with the last version of cncf.kubernetes provider? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > No I did not. By default, the system test script uses the most > >> recent > >> > > > release, which is 7.1.0. I'll try running the tests again with the > >> > newer > >> > > > version. As I mentioned, I don't except there to be any problems. > >> It's > >> > > very > >> > > > clear that the issue came from the missing code 😃 > >> > > > > >> > > > ________________________________ > >> > > > From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > >> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 12:31:59 PM > >> > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > >> > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July > 06, > >> > 2023 > >> > > > > >> > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. > Do > >> not > >> > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender > >> and > >> > > know > >> > > > the content is safe. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Just to clarify the state here - in case further discussions are > >> > needed. > >> > > > > >> > > > Amazon Provider has this optional extra dependency: > >> > > > > >> > > > - name: cncf.kubernetes > >> > > > dependencies: > >> > > > - apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0 > >> > > > > >> > > > We cannot enforce it when you install just a single "amazon" > >> provider. > >> > > but > >> > > > the presence of the "[cncf.kubernetes]" extra with > >> > > > apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0 is a clear > >> indication > >> > > that > >> > > > the new 7.2.0 provider is needed to run "kubernetes" optional > >> features > >> > in > >> > > > the provider. Once both providers are released, either constraints > >> for > >> > a > >> > > > given version or even "pip install > >> > > apache-airflow[amazon,cncf.kubernetes]" > >> > > > will pull the latest versions, so this will work fine. > >> > > > > >> > > > The way `pip` and Python dependency management work - you cannot > >> > > provide a > >> > > > limit to a dependency that is optional (other than providing extra > >> like > >> > > we > >> > > > do). If "some" features of the `amazon` provider depend on > >> > > > `cncf.kubernetes`, then other than extra (as we did) there is no > >> way to > >> > > > inform `pip` or any other tool that "when you install those two > >> > packages > >> > > > the other should be at least this version". Such feature does not > >> exist > >> > > in > >> > > > `pip` or any other resolver. > >> > > > > >> > > > There are two ways to resolve it: > >> > > > > >> > > > 1) provide optional extra that informs about the limit but unless > >> you > >> > do > >> > > > `pip install apache-airflow-providers-amazon[cncf.kubernetes]` > >> there is > >> > > no > >> > > > enforcement - for example there is no way to "upgrade" > >> cncf.kubernetes > >> > > > automatically when you upgrade `amazon` one. This is what we have. > >> > > > 2) make cncf.kubernetes a REQUIRED dependency. We could add just > >> > regular > >> > > > "apache-airflow-provider-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0" as a requirement > of > >> > the > >> > > > amazon provider. We COULD do it if we decide that cncf.kubernetes > is > >> > > always > >> > > > going to be installed with the amazon one - regardless if someone > >> uses > >> > > EKS > >> > > > or not. > >> > > > > >> > > > The case 2) has the unintended side effect in this case, that if > >> > someone > >> > > > uses amazon (but not EKS) and kubernetes, they will have no way to > >> > > > downgrade the cncf.kubernetes provider to a lower version - thus > >> > > > introducing strong coupling between these two providers. > >> > > > > >> > > > J. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:11 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hello Hussain, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Did you test with the last version of cncf.kubernetes provider? > ( > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.2.0rc2 > >> > > > > ) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:59 PM Hussain, Syed > >> > > <syeda...@amazon.com.invalid > >> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I ran the system tests for the Amazon Provider Package for > >> this > >> > > > > > release, using Airflow version 2.6.2. Here is the link to the > >> > > dashboard > >> > > > > for > >> > > > > > the results: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://aws-mwaa.github.io/open-source/system-tests/version/2.6.2_8.3.0rc2.html > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > All system tests related to EKS failed, due to being unable to > >> > import > >> > > > > > "OnFinishAction" ( > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/utils/pod_manager.py#L718 > >> > > > > ). > >> > > > > > This was added 6 days ago, and is not included in the current > >> > > release. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ________________________________ > >> > > > > > From: Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 10:46:58 PM > >> > > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > >> > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July > >> 06, > >> > > 2023 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > >> organization. Do > >> > > not > >> > > > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the > >> sender > >> > and > >> > > > > know > >> > > > > > the content is safe. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hey all,I have just cut RC2 wave Airflow Providers packages. > >> This > >> > > > > > email is calling a vote on the release,which will last for 72 > >> > hours - > >> > > > > > which means that it will end on July 09, 2023 05:50 AM > >> UTCConsider > >> > > > > > this my (binding) +1. > >> > > > > > Airflow Providers are available > >> > > > > > at: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/*apache-airflow-providers- > >> > > > > > <PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* > >> > > > > > are the binary Python "sdist" release - they are also official > >> > > > > > "sources" for the provider > >> > > > > > packages.*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the > >> binary > >> > > > > > Python "wheel" release.The test procedure for PMC members who > >> would > >> > > > > > like to test the RC candidates are described > >> > > > > > inhttps:// > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-membersand > >> > > > > > for Contributors: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributorsPublic > >> > > > > > keys are available > >> > > > > > at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYSPlease > >> > > vote > >> > > > > > accordingly:[ ] +1 approve[ ] +0 no opinion[ ] -1 disapprove > >> with > >> > the > >> > > > > > reasonOnly votes from PMC members are binding, but members of > >> the > >> > > > > > community are encouraged to test the release and vote with > >> > > > > > "(non-binding)".Please note that the version number excludes > the > >> > > 'rcX' > >> > > > > > string.This will allow us to rename the artifact without > >> > modifyingthe > >> > > > > > artifact checksums when we actually release.The status of > >> testing > >> > the > >> > > > > > providers by the community is kept > >> > > > > > here:https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32389 > >> > > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following > >> the > >> > > below > >> > > > > > links: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/2.5.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.3.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/6.1.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala/1.1.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.1.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/3.5.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apprise/1.0.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.2.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.6.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/4.3.1rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.2.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.0.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.3.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp/3.4.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/6.2.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.5.2rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/4.3.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.2.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.5.0rc2/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Cheers,Elad Kalif > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
