+1 non-binding
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 10:14 PM utkarsh sharma <utkarshar...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 6:28 PM, Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding), I've tested my changes, and executed some testing dags > > for kubernetes, AWS and kafka providers. > > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 5:56 AM Wei Lee <wei....@astronomer.io.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Wei > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 2023, at 9:32 PM, Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io > > .INVALID> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:43 PM Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (non binding) > > > >> > > > >> I tested the amazon provider package by running my testing dags > > > >> > > > >> On 2023/07/07 12:48:07 Pankaj Koti wrote: > > > >>> *Change of vote: +1 (non-binding)* > > > >>> Since ES RC is being excluded I have no other reservations. > > > >>> Thank you Elad for all the efforts! > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Pankaj Koti > > > >>> > > > >>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > > >>> Location: Pune, India > > > >>> > > > >>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > >>> > > > >>> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > >>> > > > >>> Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:15 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> given confirmation of the elasticseach issue > > > >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1625045594 > > > >>>> apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.0.0rc2 > > > >>>> < > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1625045594apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.0.0rc2 > > > >>> > > > >>>> is excluded from this > > > >>>> release. I will cut ad hoc rc3 for this provider once a fix is > > merged. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> RC2 vote continues for the rest of providers. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:54 AM Pankaj Koti > > > >>>> <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> *Change of vote: -1 (non-binding)* > > > >>>>> Sorry, I would like to change my vote to *-1 (non-binding) *due > to > > > >> the > > > >>>> bug > > > >>>>> confirmed by the author in Elasticsearch RC. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Just saw that the author confirmed that they are able to > reproduce > > > >> this > > > >>>>> issue. It is a regression as it used to work fine with > > > >>>>> apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch==4.5.1 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Sorry again for the confusion. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Pankaj Koti > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > > >>>>> Location: Pune, India > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:16 PM Pankaj Koti < > > > >> pankaj.k...@astronomer.io> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Elad, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Yes, sorry for the vagueness. I am unsure if it is a bug and > there > > > >> is > > > >>>> no > > > >>>>>> linked documentation with the PR suggesting a change needed in > the > > > >>>>>> configuration. > > > >>>>>> I am waiting for a response from the author. At the moment, it > is > > a > > > >>>>>> regression for me as my previous remote logging setup using > > > >>>> Elasticsearch > > > >>>>>> is no longer working and the webserver reports errors when it > > > >> tries to > > > >>>>>> fetch logs from the Elasticsearch server whereas I see that logs > > > >> are > > > >>>>>> getting shipped correctly to Elasticsearch. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I would like to cast a *+0 (non-binding) *because a series of > > > >> other RCs > > > >>>>>> mentioned below work fine, it's just Elasticsearch RC waiting > for > > a > > > >>>>>> response. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Below RCs work fine: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-amazon > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-databricks > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-google > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure > > > >>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-snowflake > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Pankaj Koti > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > > >>>>>> Location: Pune, India > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 1:45 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Pankaj, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Troubles is a very vague word :) > > > >>>>>>> Does troubles mean regression/blocker bug or maybe this just > > > >> requires > > > >>>>>>> further doc clarification? > > > >>>>>>> From the PR comments it's not clear to me if this is just a > > > >>>>>>> mis-configuration concern or an actual bug. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Please cast a non-binding with explanation of the impact of > this > > > >> RC > > > >>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>> (you can change your vote later if new information comes to > > light) > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 10:33 AM Pankaj Koti > > > >>>>>>> <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I am facing trouble with using the ElasticSearch RC. > > > >>>>>>>> The remote logging setup that used to work for me previously > is > > > >> no > > > >>>>>>> longer > > > >>>>>>>> working with this change. > > > >>>>>>>> I have reached out for help on the PR with comment > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31920#issuecomment-1623629476 > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Pankaj Koti > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > > > >>>>>>>> Location: Pune, India > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Mobile: +91 9730079985 > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 3:56 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > > >> verified > > > >>>> that > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> sources from the provider"tag" are used for all new > providers. > > > >>>>> tested > > > >>>>>>> my > > > >>>>>>>>> change in hive. All looks good > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:43 PM Hussain, Syed > > > >>>>>>> <syeda...@amazon.com.invalid > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jarek for clarifying 😊 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Did you test with the last version of cncf.kubernetes > > > >>>> provider? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> No I did not. By default, the system test script uses the > > > >> most > > > >>>>>>> recent > > > >>>>>>>>>> release, which is 7.1.0. I'll try running the tests again > > > >> with > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> newer > > > >>>>>>>>>> version. As I mentioned, I don't except there to be any > > > >>>> problems. > > > >>>>>>> It's > > > >>>>>>>>> very > > > >>>>>>>>>> clear that the issue came from the missing code 😃 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 12:31:59 PM > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on > > > >> July > > > >>>>> 06, > > > >>>>>>>> 2023 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > > > >> organization. > > > >>>>> Do > > > >>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the > > > >>>> sender > > > >>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> know > > > >>>>>>>>>> the content is safe. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify the state here - in case further > > > >> discussions are > > > >>>>>>>> needed. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Amazon Provider has this optional extra dependency: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> - name: cncf.kubernetes > > > >>>>>>>>>> dependencies: > > > >>>>>>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> We cannot enforce it when you install just a single "amazon" > > > >>>>>>> provider. > > > >>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>> the presence of the "[cncf.kubernetes]" extra with > > > >>>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0 is a clear > > > >>>>>>> indication > > > >>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>> the new 7.2.0 provider is needed to run "kubernetes" > > > >> optional > > > >>>>>>> features > > > >>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>> the provider. Once both providers are released, either > > > >>>> constraints > > > >>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>> given version or even "pip install > > > >>>>>>>>> apache-airflow[amazon,cncf.kubernetes]" > > > >>>>>>>>>> will pull the latest versions, so this will work fine. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> The way `pip` and Python dependency management work - you > > > >>>> cannot > > > >>>>>>>>> provide a > > > >>>>>>>>>> limit to a dependency that is optional (other than providing > > > >>>> extra > > > >>>>>>> like > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>> do). If "some" features of the `amazon` provider depend on > > > >>>>>>>>>> `cncf.kubernetes`, then other than extra (as we did) there > > > >> is no > > > >>>>>>> way to > > > >>>>>>>>>> inform `pip` or any other tool that "when you install those > > > >> two > > > >>>>>>>> packages > > > >>>>>>>>>> the other should be at least this version". Such feature > > > >> does > > > >>>> not > > > >>>>>>> exist > > > >>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>> `pip` or any other resolver. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> There are two ways to resolve it: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1) provide optional extra that informs about the limit but > > > >>>> unless > > > >>>>>>> you > > > >>>>>>>> do > > > >>>>>>>>>> `pip install > > > >> apache-airflow-providers-amazon[cncf.kubernetes]` > > > >>>>>>> there is > > > >>>>>>>>> no > > > >>>>>>>>>> enforcement - for example there is no way to "upgrade" > > > >>>>>>> cncf.kubernetes > > > >>>>>>>>>> automatically when you upgrade `amazon` one. This is what we > > > >>>> have. > > > >>>>>>>>>> 2) make cncf.kubernetes a REQUIRED dependency. We could add > > > >> just > > > >>>>>>>> regular > > > >>>>>>>>>> "apache-airflow-provider-cncf-kubernetes>=7.2.0" as a > > > >>>> requirement > > > >>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> amazon provider. We COULD do it if we decide that > > > >>>> cncf.kubernetes > > > >>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>> always > > > >>>>>>>>>> going to be installed with the amazon one - regardless if > > > >>>> someone > > > >>>>>>> uses > > > >>>>>>>>> EKS > > > >>>>>>>>>> or not. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> The case 2) has the unintended side effect in this case, > > > >> that if > > > >>>>>>>> someone > > > >>>>>>>>>> uses amazon (but not EKS) and kubernetes, they will have no > > > >> way > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>> downgrade the cncf.kubernetes provider to a lower version - > > > >> thus > > > >>>>>>>>>> introducing strong coupling between these two providers. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> J. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:11 PM Hussein Awala < > > > >> huss...@awala.fr> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Hussain, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Did you test with the last version of cncf.kubernetes > > > >>>> provider? > > > >>>>> ( > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.2.0rc2 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ) > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:59 PM Hussain, Syed > > > >>>>>>>>> <syeda...@amazon.com.invalid > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I ran the system tests for the Amazon Provider > > > >> Package > > > >>>> for > > > >>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release, using Airflow version 2.6.2. Here is the link > > > >> to > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> dashboard > > > >>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the results: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://aws-mwaa.github.io/open-source/system-tests/version/2.6.2_8.3.0rc2.html > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> All system tests related to EKS failed, due to being > > > >> unable > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>>> import > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "OnFinishAction" ( > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/utils/pod_manager.py#L718 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This was added 6 days ago, and is not included in the > > > >>>> current > > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 10:46:58 PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on > > > >>>> July > > > >>>>>>> 06, > > > >>>>>>>>> 2023 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the > > > >>>>>>> organization. Do > > > >>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>> sender > > > >>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>> know > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the content is safe. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,I have just cut RC2 wave Airflow Providers > > > >> packages. > > > >>>>>>> This > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> email is calling a vote on the release,which will last > > > >> for > > > >>>> 72 > > > >>>>>>>> hours - > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which means that it will end on July 09, 2023 05:50 AM > > > >>>>>>> UTCConsider > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this my (binding) +1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow Providers are available > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/*apache-airflow-providers- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are the binary Python "sdist" release - they are also > > > >>>> official > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "sources" for the provider > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> packages.*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Python "wheel" release.The test procedure for PMC > > > >> members > > > >>>> who > > > >>>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> like to test the RC candidates are described > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> inhttps:// > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-membersand > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for Contributors: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributorsPublic > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> keys are available > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at: > > > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYSPlease > > > >>>>>>>>> vote > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> accordingly:[ ] +1 approve[ ] +0 no opinion[ ] -1 > > > >> disapprove > > > >>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> reasonOnly votes from PMC members are binding, but > > > >> members > > > >>>> of > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> community are encouraged to test the release and vote > > > >> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "(non-binding)".Please note that the version number > > > >> excludes > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> 'rcX' > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> string.This will allow us to rename the artifact without > > > >>>>>>>> modifyingthe > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> artifact checksums when we actually release.The status > > > >> of > > > >>>>>>> testing > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> providers by the community is kept > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> here:https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32389 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog > > > >>>> following > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> below > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> links: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/2.5.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.3.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/6.1.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala/1.1.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.1.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/3.5.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apprise/1.0.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.2.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.6.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/4.3.1rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/3.2.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/5.0.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.3.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp/3.4.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/6.2.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/5.5.2rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/4.3.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/5.2.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/3.5.0rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,Elad Kalif > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
