Glad to hear it, Aritra! It means reviewing and helping us present the
results to the larger community in a valuable way.

EG here is how we did last year's:
<https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/>


On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Briana,
> What does analysing the results entail? Sounds intriguing, I'd be
> interested to help.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 9:03 PM Briana Okyere
> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > Thank you so much for this feedback- I reviewed all of your notes
> yesterday
> > with a few other folks and we were able to implement many of your
> > suggestions to make this thing even better than last year's.
> >
> > I will be closing feedback now so we can move forward with getting this
> > thing out there, and will post it to the devlist so you can check it out
> > and hopefully complete it!
> >
> > If anyone is interested in helping to analyze the results, please let me
> > know- and thank you again!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 6:37 PM Mehta, Shubham <shu...@amazon.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Briana,
> > >
> > > Thank you for putting this together. It's looking pretty good for the
> > > first draft.
> > >
> > > I have added quite a few comments and left some suggestions for
> changes.
> > A
> > > few important things to call out here:
> > >
> > > 1. We should work backwards from what our goals are with this survey
> and
> > > how we want this to inform us, removing any questions that don't help
> us
> > in
> > > forming any opinion. For instance, the question "How many people at
> your
> > > company directly work on data?" probably won’t inform us about
> anything.
> > > Instead, asking "YOE with Airflow" would help us understand new user
> > > preferences versus pro user preferences.
> > >
> > > 2. In the demographics section, it would be beneficial to ascertain
> > > whether the respondent only uses Airflow or contributes to it as well.
> > This
> > > way, we can completely hide the section about contribution and vice
> > versa.
> > >
> > > 3. Some of the options are quite descriptive. Let’s aim to reduce the
> > time
> > > to finish the survey as much as possible.
> > >
> > > 4. Can you please indicate which questions should have single-choice
> > > answers and which should have multiple-choice answers? Last year, there
> > > were some questions that should have been multiple choice, but were
> > > formatted as single choice, resulting in mixed responses.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Shubham
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2023-10-25, 12:35 PM, "Jarek Potiuk" <ja...@potiuk.com <mailto:
> > > ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > > the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
> externe.
> > > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne
> > pouvez
> > > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain
> > que
> > > le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree with Andrey's suggestions - added a few of mine directly to the
> > docs
> > > as comments/suggestions. Summary of my comments:
> > >
> > >
> > > * mentioning 2.5 providers compatibility and reasoning why people
> staying
> > > below 2.5
> > > * I thing suggesting list of services/tools Airflow might interact with
> > to
> > > choose, will introduce bias and will make it difficult to get "real"
> > > impression on what is used. I suggest leaving it "freeform".
> > > * asking questions about importance/ways how they are managing security
> > of
> > > their deployment (and whether they follow advisories)
> > > * I think we should also ask question about "other" orchestration tools
> > and
> > > what made people choose airflow/consider others
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:58 PM Andrey Anshin <
> andrey.ans...@taragol.is
> > > <mailto:andrey.ans...@taragol.is>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hey Briana,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for sharing questions. Let me share some idea/improvements,
> but
> > it
> > > > only my thoughts so it could be non-relevant for create clear survey
> > > >
> > > > *Which version of Airflow do you currently use*
> > > > Maybe it's better keep only this one?
> > > > - 1.10
> > > > - <=2.4
> > > > - 2.5
> > > > - 2.6
> > > > - 2.7
> > > >
> > > > 1.10 it is so legacy now
> > > > 2-2.4 not so legacy, but latest providers can't be install on this
> > > versions
> > > > 2.5.x it is the highest version which might install latest providers
> > > >
> > > > *Which Metadata Database do you use?*
> > > >
> > > > My suggestion is to make this question, if it possible, only for
> > > > self-hosted Airflow installation. I guess for Managed Airflow it
> would
> > > > always be Postgres.
> > > >
> > > > An split this question by two different
> > > >
> > > > First about type of DB
> > > >
> > > > - MySQL (not MariaDB)
> > > > - Postgres
> > > > - Microsoft SQL Server
> > > > - Other: ______
> > > >
> > > > Second one about version DB version
> > > >
> > > > - Version: ______
> > > > - I don't know
> > > >
> > > > Every year new version of Postgres released, so if we consider that
> > some
> > > > users might still use 1.10.x then it could be a chance 9.4 - 9.5 used
> > > > I think more interesting in this question is Postgres have critical
> > total
> > > > share value (like 80-90 of all respondent) from which we might start
> > > think,
> > > > is actually we need in the future (Airflow 3.x/4.x) something
> different
> > > > rather than Postgres and SQLite (for testing)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----
> > > > Best Wishes
> > > > *Andrey Anshin*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 19:08, Briana Okyere
> > > > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva <mailto:
> > > briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva>lid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey All,
> > > > >
> > > > > For the last few years, we've sent out surveys to get a sense of
> the
> > > > state
> > > > > of this Airflow community, and this year I've been tasked with
> > > > distributing
> > > > > it. I'd love to get your feedback before it's pushed live.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've made some minor tweaks to the 2022 survey and added the
> > questions
> > > to
> > > > > this google doc: <
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbluXNGq9cI3N9zw1cH4F4cEQfyIQ6tk7tGLo4ZN4AE/edit?usp=sharing
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbluXNGq9cI3N9zw1cH4F4cEQfyIQ6tk7tGLo4ZN4AE/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anything you think should be added or removed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note- it is useful to compare data from previous years to
> this
> > > > year,
> > > > > so I believe the majority of the questions should remain
> similar-ish.
> > > > > However, there is always room for improvement!
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are last year's results for reference:
> > > > > <https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/> <
> > > https://airflow.apache.org/blog/airflow-survey-2022/&gt;>
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, if anyone is interested in helping with analysis after the
> > > results
> > > > > are in, please let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Briana Okyere
> > > > > Community Manager
> > > > > Email: briana.oky...@astronomer.io <mailto:
> > briana.oky...@astronomer.io
> > > >
> > > > > <john....@astronomer.io <mailto:john....@astronomer.io>>Mobile: +1
> > > 415.713.9943
> > > > > Time zone: US Pacific UTC
> > > > >
> > > > > <https://www.astronomer.io/> <https://www.astronomer.io/&gt;>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to