The bot idea is great and being able to be anonymous is important! I'm not a fan of filling out forms and that could be a deterrent for people trying expressing their concerns, especially if they misinterpret the form structure/criteria. So def in favor of a #2 type approach with a bot.
-- Rajesh On 2024-02-05, 10:13 AM, "Jarek Potiuk" <ja...@potiuk.com <mailto:ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. I think the bot would be best. It would be great if the reports are made to a private channel (the bot that Andrey posted seems to be doing just that) where it can be discussed between the admin channels and action taken. Plus some way of knowing who is in the admin channel and invitation to contact them privately in case someone feels it's not good to post to the channel (reasons explained before). J. On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 1:42 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com <mailto:weilee...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I believe that anonymity is important in this case. It would be great if > we could have the bot suggested by Aritra, and option #2 is favorable. > Alternatively, I would prefer option #1. Thanks! > > Best regards, > Wei Lee > > > On Feb 4, 2024, at 12:37 AM, Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com > > <mailto:aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > > I'm very much for anonymity here, so if we could have some kind of bot > > that'd be great. Though even without that I think the combination of > > channel and form also works out fine for talking to a person vs wanting > > anonymity. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Aritra Basu > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, 9:12 PM Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is > > <mailto:andrey.ans...@taragol.is>> > wrote: > > > >> I’m also for some bot/application, after quick search I’ve found this > one > >> https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool > >> <https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool> > >> > >> > >> I’m not sure is it suits our requirements and it required instance where > >> this code would be deployed but it worthwhile to check it, especially if > >> someone familiar with Typescript > >> > >>> On 3 Feb 2024, at 19:19, Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com > >>> <mailto:amoghdesai....@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I would also like to go with #2. > >>> > >>> But just to bring up, how easy / hard is it to have a slack bot that > >> users > >>> can use to report > >>> bad users or spam users. Never done it before myself, but it would be a > >>> great interface to report issues. > >>> > >>> The issues would then come to few admins who can take regulatory > action. > >>> (Might be an overkill, but thinking out loud here) > >>> > >>> Thanks & Regards, > >>> Amogh Desai > >>> > >>>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 2:55 AM Briana Okyere > >>>> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva > >>>> <mailto:briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva>lid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hey All, > >>>> > >>>> I'm breaking this out into another conversation because I think it > >> warrants > >>>> its own decision before we move forward. > >>>> > >>>> Last week, I proposed we add a code of conduct for Airflow Slack and > >>>> in-person meetups. > >>>> Thread: < > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87> > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87>> > >>>> > >>>> In the Code of Conduct I shared, there is a conversation taking place > >> about > >>>> HOW to report someone in Slack if their message does not abide by the > >> code > >>>> of conduct. > >>>> > >>>> There is a general consensus that a committee should be formed that > >> people > >>>> can report code of conduct violations to. > >>>> > >>>> Two options were proposed about the reporting process: > >>>> 1. Create a google form that people can fill out anonymously to report > >> code > >>>> of conduct violations > >>>> 2. Create a channel in slack called #slack-admins where people can > post > >> and > >>>> report a violation. > >>>> > >>>> I would like to know which option you all vote for. I vote for option > >> #2. > >>>> With the addition that we should have a #slack-admins channel that > >> links to > >>>> the google form for anonymous reporting, but also serves as a space > >> where > >>>> people can post questions about the code of conduct and receive > clarity > >> and > >>>> answers. But I strongly feel there should be an option to anonymously > >>>> report, which I think a form would solve. > >>>> > >>>> Curious what others think, or if you have additional ideas! > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> Briana Okyere > >>>> Community Manager > >>>> Astronomer > >>>> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@airflow.apache.org> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
