Let us try to summarise and see what the bot has to do. Summarising:
1. The bot should allow users to report issues - anonymously too (or maybe
an option)
2. These issues should get redirected to an admin channel / private channel
3. Some command in the bot that could allow users to find out the people in
that channel so that they can be contacted
privately too

Havent deployed a bot ever, but would be willing to try

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:58 AM Briana Okyere
<briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:

> I agree with the bot idea- does anyone on this thread have the ability to
> implement it?
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:58 AM Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
> <rbish...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > The bot idea is great and being able to be anonymous is important! I'm
> not
> > a fan of filling out forms and that could be a deterrent for people
> trying
> > expressing their concerns, especially if they misinterpret the form
> > structure/criteria. So def in favor of a #2 type approach with a bot.
> >
> > -- Rajesh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2024-02-05, 10:13 AM, "Jarek Potiuk" <ja...@potiuk.com <mailto:
> > ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe.
> > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne
> pouvez
> > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain
> que
> > le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think the bot would be best. It would be great if the reports are made
> to
> > a private channel (the bot that Andrey posted seems to be doing just
> that)
> > where it can be discussed between the admin channels and action taken.
> Plus
> > some way of knowing who is in the admin channel and invitation to contact
> > them privately in case someone feels it's not good to post to the channel
> > (reasons explained before).
> >
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 1:42 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com <mailto:
> > weilee...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I believe that anonymity is important in this case. It would be great
> if
> > > we could have the bot suggested by Aritra, and option #2 is favorable.
> > > Alternatively, I would prefer option #1. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Wei Lee
> > >
> > > > On Feb 4, 2024, at 12:37 AM, Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm very much for anonymity here, so if we could have some kind of
> bot
> > > > that'd be great. Though even without that I think the combination of
> > > > channel and form also works out fine for talking to a person vs
> wanting
> > > > anonymity.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Aritra Basu
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, 9:12 PM Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is
> > <mailto:andrey.ans...@taragol.is>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I’m also for some bot/application, after quick search I’ve found
> this
> > > one
> > > >> https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool <
> > https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I’m not sure is it suits our requirements and it required instance
> > where
> > > >> this code would be deployed but it worthwhile to check it,
> especially
> > if
> > > >> someone familiar with Typescript
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 3 Feb 2024, at 19:19, Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com
> > <mailto:amoghdesai....@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would also like to go with #2.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But just to bring up, how easy / hard is it to have a slack bot
> that
> > > >> users
> > > >>> can use to report
> > > >>> bad users or spam users. Never done it before myself, but it would
> > be a
> > > >>> great interface to report issues.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The issues would then come to few admins who can take regulatory
> > > action.
> > > >>> (Might be an overkill, but thinking out loud here)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks & Regards,
> > > >>> Amogh Desai
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 2:55 AM Briana Okyere
> > > >>>> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva <mailto:
> > briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva>lid> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hey All,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm breaking this out into another conversation because I think it
> > > >> warrants
> > > >>>> its own decision before we move forward.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Last week, I proposed we add a code of conduct for Airflow Slack
> and
> > > >>>> in-person meetups.
> > > >>>> Thread: <
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87&gt;>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> In the Code of Conduct I shared, there is a conversation taking
> > place
> > > >> about
> > > >>>> HOW to report someone in Slack if their message does not abide by
> > the
> > > >> code
> > > >>>> of conduct.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> There is a general consensus that a committee should be formed
> that
> > > >> people
> > > >>>> can report code of conduct violations to.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Two options were proposed about the reporting process:
> > > >>>> 1. Create a google form that people can fill out anonymously to
> > report
> > > >> code
> > > >>>> of conduct violations
> > > >>>> 2. Create a channel in slack called #slack-admins where people can
> > > post
> > > >> and
> > > >>>> report a violation.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I would like to know which option you all vote for. I vote for
> > option
> > > >> #2.
> > > >>>> With the addition that we should have a #slack-admins channel that
> > > >> links to
> > > >>>> the google form for anonymous reporting, but also serves as a
> space
> > > >> where
> > > >>>> people can post questions about the code of conduct and receive
> > > clarity
> > > >> and
> > > >>>> answers. But I strongly feel there should be an option to
> > anonymously
> > > >>>> report, which I think a form would solve.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Curious what others think, or if you have additional ideas!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ---
> > > >>>> Briana Okyere
> > > >>>> Community Manager
> > > >>>> Astronomer
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org <mailto:
> > dev-h...@airflow.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> >
>

Reply via email to