+1 on clarifying the policy for sure. However, I have concerns around the rest of this from a reliability standpoint. Unless this is to be used only for critical situations and for selective providers only, this seems like a speed vs. reliability tradeoff.
I am uncomfortable with this. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:22 PM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm kinda of the same opinion as Elad here. +1 for clarifying the policy, > but I have some concerns on the rest of it. > > If we really do restrict these to critical situations, these should be rare > enough that we aren't burning out RMs. Opening this door to only say "no, > not critical enough" more often than not (assuming folks are eager to do > frequent releases), seems a bit weird to me. >
