+1 (binding) - it's an important feature IMO, and after reading the AIP and the comments here - I think that TP's suggestion for compatibility and migration mitigates the related concerns.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:44 AM Tzu-ping Chung <t...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m calling for a vote on AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator > Arguments. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2grOEg > > This proposal aims to improve how Airflow defines template fields, and > help users avoid annoying pitfalls currently exist. > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/yjcgb6fhn365n3307blq4y4v50gjynsy > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > Votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but everyone in the > community is also encouraged to vote. > > The vote will run for 5 days and last until 2024-07-30 8:00 UTC. > > Consider this as my vote as +1. > > TP
