Thanks TP for the rework. I added some comments (iteration 2) on the migration ideas. I think these details make it clearer, still i have partial doubts how much burden we add to users to migrate DAGs to get to version 3. I very much favor the new templating but am not sure how many DAG authors we leave with migration problems behind. Do we have a guess or estimation how much burden we as airflow developers need to keep as compatability compared to the amount of DAG templates that people neet to adjust?
Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Tzu-ping Chung <t...@astronomer.io.INVALID> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2024 8:54:58 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org> Cc: michalmod...@google.com <michalmod...@google.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments I have updated the AIP to include the additional compatibility discussions in this thread. Please take a look again. Specifically (although by no means exclusively) it would be awesome if Michał you could have a look and see if it addresses more of the concerns and could be viable for you. Although the vote is non-binding, I still would like to be more confident I tried to address the real concerns from the community, which is the real problem when it comes to migration. Link to document for convenience https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fx%2F2grOEg&data=05%7C02%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com%7C9318251bd2fe4490b64308dcafffffe5%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638578761240102546%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vVICot9p06VQJ56QmP9dwvEaWfpR7nCcMVqUexl6B3w%3D&reserved=0<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2grOEg> TP
