+1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1. Yes. That's cool. > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:34 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Completely agreed on this. > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:19 PM Tzu-ping Chung <t...@astronomer.io.invalid > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have published a draft AIP to remove the unique constraint on the > > > execution_date field of table dag_run in the meta database. This is a > > > long-planned todo item from AIP-39 (where we introduced logical date > and > > > make DAG runs unique on run_id), and we can finally do this > > > compatibility-breaking change in 3.0. > > > > > > Since we have already done the necessary leg work as parts of the > > previous > > > AIP, I expect this to not be particularly controversial. The migrations > > > should be mostly smooth as well, from I can tell. > > > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > > > > > AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/SA3OEg > > > > > > TP > > >
