Sorry TP, that was my mistake. I started the "vote responses" :) You can count my response as a real vote when you start the voting thread.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:19 AM Tzu-ping Chung <t...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Hey folks just a heads up this is NOT a voting thread :p > > I’ll count the existing replies toward real votes when the thread is > posted. Drop a word if I shouldn’t. > > TP > > > > On 30 Jul 2024, at 11:40, Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > >> +1. Yes. That's cool. > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:34 AM Vikram Koka > <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid > >>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Completely agreed on this. > >>> > >>> +1 binding > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:19 PM Tzu-ping Chung > <t...@astronomer.io.invalid > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I have published a draft AIP to remove the unique constraint on the > >>>> execution_date field of table dag_run in the meta database. This is a > >>>> long-planned todo item from AIP-39 (where we introduced logical date > >> and > >>>> make DAG runs unique on run_id), and we can finally do this > >>>> compatibility-breaking change in 3.0. > >>>> > >>>> Since we have already done the necessary leg work as parts of the > >>> previous > >>>> AIP, I expect this to not be particularly controversial. The > migrations > >>>> should be mostly smooth as well, from I can tell. > >>>> > >>>> Please let me know what you think. > >>>> > >>>> AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/SA3OEg > >>>> > >>>> TP > >>> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >
