Thanks Jarek, great work on simplifying and securing CI workflows!

--
Regards,
Vishnu Chilukoori

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 2:57 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Woohooo Thanks Jarek Great work :)
>
> Regards,
> Pavan
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 10:15 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello here,
> >
> > TL;DR; I just merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45266 -
> > which implemented a much simplified and nicer workflow for our CI.
> >
> > Rebase to the latest `main` and you should be good to go.
> >
> > It (finally) switches o from a workflow we had for years (using pretty
> > dangerous from the security point of view `pull_request_target`
> workflow) -
> > into using Artifacts for sharing images in workflow. This was possible
> > thanks to new "artifacts" actions and switching to UV.
> >
> > The benefit of it is that it is way safer - no more "dangerous workflows"
> > and simpler - we have a lot simpler Dockerfile.ci and caching mechanism
> > implemented. We worked this out by discussing with other ASF projects and
> > actually even reusing an action developed by a fellow Apache Arrow
> > committer and PMC member - Jacob Wujciak.
> >
> > The things everyone should do:
> >
> > * rebase your PR to latest main to make your PRs rebuilt using the new
> > workflow
> > * run `breeze ci-image build` if you are using breeze locally
> >
> > I expect some teething problems, so do not hesitate to raise your
> problems
> > in #internal-airflow-ci-cd channel for CI or #airflow-breeze channel if
> you
> > see breeze problems
> >
> > Your regular workflows should continue working as usual, you should see
> > just one workflow in CI running builds and tests instead of two.
> >
> > J.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to