+1 for #45563 (Sphinx). A very good first step forward! On 2025/01/28 08:34:31 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Yeah, I am also for Sphinx #45563. > > I think we have plenty of "new feature" PRs that a lot of busy folks are > working on so this is really a tough one, but I think those PR will be > praised and touted (and people working on them collectively and > individually) when we go to release announcements, and - especially - > Airflow Summit talks and new users using our features (yes Airflow Summit > is coming this fall and we are announcing it this week !!!) > > But there is a big value in all the "groundwork", where there are things > that are either slowing us down because they have not been touched for > years or introduce security risks or simply block us from making more > modern and bolder moves. This work is often unappreciated and goes > below-the-radar, so a little appreciation of those things goes a long way. > Great job Shahar! > > Also this is but the beginning of the Doc build improvement work we MUST do > now. The Sphinx migration has been attempted like 4 (!) times in the past > and the efforts generally stalled every time, this time Shahar made it > (with a little help for Jens and myself). And we have more things coming on > the doc building and publishing, which we will also have a chance to > appreciate next month I hope - we are on a good track with Pavan's hard > work and Ash's ideas and input to finally get rid of sub-hour doc build > times and big risk that our Docs will finally stop working. That includes > introducing (mandatory by the ASF as of end of February) Privacy Content > Security Policies that ASF will start enforcing in a month - so this is > very appropriate timing that will allow us to make and publish those > necessary Doc changes - without using a lot of time (and mental health). > > J. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 8:31 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Anyways, tough set of choices definitely!! > > > > My vote goes to #45563. Good job Shahar and everyone who assisted him. > > (Jens and Jarek if I am not mistaken) > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:59 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I wonder why the format of PR candidates look like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > *PR #45627: Start porting mapped task to SDK > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45627 > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45627>< > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44332 > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44332>>>* > > > > > > The first one is the PR which we need, what about the second one? It > > > doesn't seem to be related at all. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 4:31 AM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Tough month! My vote goes to the sphinx upgrade, #45563. > > >> > > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
