Similar experience as Elad, I am in favor of disabling it tbh. For example,
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49727 has a failing test as below --
which is not an issue, and test passes locally so I would want to merge it
but I can't.

FAILED
helm-tests/tests/helm_tests/airflow_aux/test_basic_helm_chart.py::TestBaseChartTest::test_priority_classes
- requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for
url:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yannh/kubernetes-json-schema/master/v1.29.1-standalone-strict/priorityclass-scheduling-v1.json

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 18:29, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 1:46 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for that Jarek!
> > I find the lack of ability to merge PRs fast very limiting but it might
> be
> > just something to get used to.
> >
>
> Indeed. I also see it, but also I got a few manually pushed "must fix
> quickly" to gitbox, and actually I find it really nice - because it is
> still possible, but it require some extra effort and deliberate "ok that
> one really should be pushed to unblock everyone" - as long as we all
> (especially those people that are active in the
> #internal-airfow-ci-cd channel) know how to do it and can fix things
> quickly, this is actually a nice way to make it into "exceptional" workflow
> - which will push us more in making sure airflow main is really "green" -
> which ultimately is our goal to make it as green as possible all the time.
>
> What **might help with that** (and also keeping the "enable auto merge"
> might motivate it more to) is to:
>
> * speed up the builds - we MUST prioritise now ARC (K8S self-hosted
> runners) to make our builds simply faster - I started a discussion and a
> small group of people who can work together to complete it after Hussein's
> POC)
> * speed up the image release - with ARM runners (which we might be able to
> do independently as recently I think we have hypervisor-enabled ARM images
> available as public runners as github made it generally available).
> * speed up the doc builds for airflow-site - we (mainly Pavan) are close to
> complete offloading of the historical release docs to S3 and I hope it will
> cut down a lot on doc publishing workflows.
>
> J,
>

Reply via email to