+1 non binding. My changes this time were only for CI fixes, those look good. And generally my dag suite tests look fine as well.
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. > Checked my changes. installed the providers in latest airflow and checked > that the SQS common.messaging is properly imported with deprecation from > the old place - and common.messaging discovers it properly. All looks good! > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:38 AM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 > votes > > have been received. > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > Provider > > distributions. > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is > > described in: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189 > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC > > candidates. > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > documentation > > after the > > RC candidates are released. > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/ > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/ > > > > Cheers, > > Elad Kalif > > >
