* Use --use-airflow-version 2.10.5
* actually install tinkerpop provider RC from PyPI - you need to install it
(and you need to restart all the components in tmux) - alternatively add
startyup script to install it
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/breeze/doc/02_customizing.rst#customizing-breeze-startup

On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:02 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Changed the subject to not muddy the VOTE thread.
>
> Removing the --use-airflow-version seemed to help get things going, but
> still not quite working. The dag isn't loading properly - guess it can't
> find the TinkerPop provider for some reason:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 241, in
> _call_with_frames_removed
>   File "/files/dags/tinkerpop.py", line 7, in <module>
>     from airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin import
> GremlinOperator
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
> 'airflow.providers.apache.tinkerpop.operators.gremlin'
>
> I imagine I just don't quite know the Airflow/Breeze environment well
> enough yet. I'll keep trying as time allows but if anyone has any helpful
> hints to move my testing along more quickly I'm happy to hear them.
> thanks.....
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 8:19 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > Did you copy paste the command below:
> > *breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 2.2.4 --python 3.9 --backend
> > postgres \*
> > *    --load-example-dags --load-default-connections*
> >
> > This is likely because the command is probably super outdated now and it
> > internally runs
> > some "removed" airflow commands? Generally speaking, `breeze down` and
> > reinstall
> > should fix it, but I guess the command needs to be updated too. Please
> feel
> > free to
> > open a PR for updating that command.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 5:06 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was trying out the contributor instructions for testing the release.
> I
> > > gravitated toward the instructions using Breeze:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#installing-with-breeze
> > >
> > > and am getting an error. I assume there's just something wrong with my
> > > environment though I wondered if it were possible that some
> documentation
> > > had gotten out of date? When I the breeze command noted there i get:
> > >
> > > airflow command error: argument GROUP_OR_COMMAND: invalid choice:
> 'users'
> > > (choose from 'api-server', 'assets', 'backfill', 'cheat-sheet',
> 'config',
> > > 'connections', 'dag-processor', 'dags', 'db', 'info', 'jobs',
> 'kerberos',
> > > 'plugins', 'pools', 'providers', 'rotate-fernet-key', 'scheduler',
> > > 'standalone', 'tasks', 'triggerer', 'variables', 'version'), see help
> > > above.
> > >
> > > Error: check_environment returned 2. Exiting.
> > >
> > > I tried a few basic things to fix on my own like breeze cleanup,
> > > self-upgrade for breeze, tinkered with some of the arguments, but all
> > ended
> > > in this fashion. Just curious if anyone knows what might be wrong
> there?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages. This
> email
> > is
> > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> > means
> > > > that it will end on May 08, 2025 07:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > > votes
> > > > have been received.
> > > >
> > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > >
> > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > >
> > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > >  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > Provider
> > > > distributions.
> > > >
> > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > >  Python "wheel" release.
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > > > described in:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > >
> > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > >
> > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50189
> > > >
> > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > > > candidates.
> > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > documentation
> > > > after the
> > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > >
> > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > >
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-tinkerpop/1.0.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-messaging/1.0.1rc1/
> > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.27.0rc1/
> > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc1/
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Elad Kalif
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to