Pavan, >From a concept perspective and strategic direction, I am in 100% agreement. I have also been thinking about this and submitted a talk for the Airflow Summit on this topic.
I am unsure of this particular package, but will look into it to understand more. The place where I do have concerns with the approach is on the interface and its integration with other providers. We have tried a very similar approach in the past with the Universal Transfer Operator and it had limited resonance / adoption. I have also seen other similar approaches proposed since and with limited uptick. This is definitely a key topic I would like to collaborate on, so let’s sync offline and get back to the dev list. Best regards, Vikram On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:35 AM Shahar Epstein <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 from me - the project seems well-maintained, and we should definitely > collaborate and open the "providers" door to Apache projects that could fit > well in Apache Airflow like this one. > If it proves itself well in the future, maybe we could think of deprecating > the "transform" operators in favor of this one, or at least make their > execution method to utilize it. >
