Yes Vikram we can discuss. Pavan,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 12:55 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Pavan, > > From a concept perspective and strategic direction, I am in 100% agreement. > I have also been thinking about this and submitted a talk for the Airflow > Summit on this topic. > > I am unsure of this particular package, but will look into it to understand > more. > > The place where I do have concerns with the approach is on the interface > and its integration with other providers. We have tried a very similar > approach in the past with the Universal Transfer Operator and it had > limited resonance / adoption. I have also seen other similar approaches > proposed since and with limited uptick. > > This is definitely a key topic I would like to collaborate on, so let’s > sync offline and get back to the dev list. > > Best regards, > Vikram > > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:35 AM Shahar Epstein <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 from me - the project seems well-maintained, and we should definitely > > collaborate and open the "providers" door to Apache projects that could > fit > > well in Apache Airflow like this one. > > If it proves itself well in the future, maybe we could think of > deprecating > > the "transform" operators in favor of this one, or at least make their > > execution method to utilize it. > > >
