Thanks Wei, I really appreciate the work, and will review it as soon as possible.
With respect to the naming, I believe the Human-in-the-loop is the right phrase, because that is recognized as such both in older "legacy" systems, as well as the new AI solutions. I agree that it may be less than ideal from a technical perspective, but from a user perspective, I believe it is better to stick with a known term, rather than to invent our own. On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi fellow Airflower, > > I am currently working on a PoC for AIP-90. I've incorporated some > suggestions based on comments in the voting thread and Jira page. Since > they have not yet been included in the AIP, I want to confirm with everyone > to ensure I'm on the right track. > > 1. Many have expressed concerns about the term “Human,” so I'm now using > the term “Interactive” as suggested by Among. For example, I change > "HumanOperator" to “InteractiveOperator". > 2. This functionality is now part of the standard provider rather than > being a separate provider as suggested by Bas and Ash. > > Here is the PoC PR. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/52053 > It's not ready to be reviewed yet, but I'll try to wrap it up over the > next few days. Several features are still missing and will be implemented > in the following pull requests. Thanks! > > Best regards, > Wei Lee
