I agree with the standard provider approach.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 7:26 PM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io> wrote: > Thanks Wei, I really appreciate the work, and will review it as soon as > possible. > > With respect to the naming, I believe the Human-in-the-loop is the right > phrase, because that is recognized as such both in older "legacy" systems, > as well as the new AI solutions. I agree that it may be less than ideal > from a technical perspective, but from a user perspective, I believe it is > better to stick with a known term, rather than to invent our own. > > > > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi fellow Airflower, >> >> I am currently working on a PoC for AIP-90. I've incorporated some >> suggestions based on comments in the voting thread and Jira page. Since >> they have not yet been included in the AIP, I want to confirm with everyone >> to ensure I'm on the right track. >> >> 1. Many have expressed concerns about the term “Human,” so I'm now using >> the term “Interactive” as suggested by Among. For example, I change >> "HumanOperator" to “InteractiveOperator". >> 2. This functionality is now part of the standard provider rather than >> being a separate provider as suggested by Bas and Ash. >> >> Here is the PoC PR. https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/52053 >> It's not ready to be reviewed yet, but I'll try to wrap it up over the >> next few days. Several features are still missing and will be implemented >> in the following pull requests. Thanks! >> >> Best regards, >> Wei Lee > >
