I promised to help Elad already - I will take it over (and complete it
later today) - unless you want of course Jens - might be a good idea to
start rotational release management duties with providers :)

On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 12:25 PM Jens Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Elad,
>
> I know you are very busy, is the VOTE completed and can the release be
> finalized? Anything where I can help?
>
> Jens
>
> On 11/5/25 17:34, Buğra Öztürk wrote:
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Bugra Ozturk
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2025, 11:38 Wei Lee, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> * Checked
> >>      * SVN
> >>      * Docker
> >>      * reproducibility
> >>      * licences
> >>      * signatures
> >>      * checksums
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Wei
> >>
> >>> On Nov 5, 2025, at 6:20 PM, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes. As of last week you can do `--use-airflow-version <PR_NUMBER>` in
> >> case
> >>> anyone missed it :). Thank Lue Zhe You for this QOL improvement again
> :).
> >>>
> >>> │ --use-airflow-version                                           Use
> >>> (reinstall at entry) Airflow version from PyPI. It can also be version
> >> (to
> >>> install from PyPI), `none`, `wheel`, or `sdist` to install from `dist`
> >>> folder, `owner/repo:branch` to install from GitHub repo, or a
> >>>   │
> >>> │
> >>>   PR number (e.g., `57219`) to install from a pull request. Uses
> >>> --mount-sources `remove` if not specified, but `providers-and-tests` or
> >>> `tests` can be specified for `--mount-sources` when
> >> `--use-airflow-version`
> >>>   │
> >>> │
> >>>   is used.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 11:15 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As a small pointer - the logic is implemented here:
> >>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/scripts/in_container/install_airflow_and_providers.py
> >>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>> It also handles installing airflow from git url and pr # (added
> recently
> >>>> by Liu Zhe You) and compiles assets in case we install from those. It
> >> has
> >>>> now a good 1000+ lines of code to handle all cases :D :D.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good luck :)
> >>>>
> >>>> J.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 11:08 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> BTW. We probably (and feel free :) could make it work when I think of
> >> it.
> >>>>> currently --use-installation-from-dist works in two steps:.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> a) installs specified airflow (or airflow from dist if found in dist)
> >> in
> >>>>> a single operation without constraints
> >>>>>
> >>>>> b) installs all other distributions without constraints
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We could probably make it three step and handle this edge case by
> >>>>> installing airflow separately (with constraints) then providers and
> all
> >>>>> other things
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will leave it as exercise for the readers though - the logic there
> is
> >>>>> already very complex and handles quite a few other cases and this one
> >> might
> >>>>> break some of them. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> śr., 5 lis 2025, 10:57 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> >>>>> napisał:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The problem is `--use-distributions-from-dist`. The
> >>>>>> `--use-airflow-version` and --use-distributions-from-dist does not
> >> use the
> >>>>>> `--use-airflow-version` constraints because it will then limit
> >> whatever is
> >>>>>> instlalled from dist (constraints from 3.1.1 have older version of
> >> edge
> >>>>>> provider and if you try to install new edge provider from "dist" and
> >>>>>> constraints pointing to the 3.1.1 provider they will conflict.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is our classic installation pattern where you install airflow +
> >>>>>> whatever was released with constraints and **then** in a separate
> >> step you
> >>>>>> install any updates. Using both constraints and something that
> >> deviates
> >>>>>> from them in the same command is not going to work.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So the right way of installing the provider for old versions is:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * breeze start-airflow --use-airflow-version 3.1.1 -> uses
> constraints
> >>>>>> * install new provider in terminal inside
> >>>>>> * restart the components in other tmux terminals
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The --use-distributions-from-dist also works but by the fact that we
> >>>>>> want to install all the distributions together (including one that
> >> deviates
> >>>>>> from original constraints) - we cannot use constraints for it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> J.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 11:09 PM Jens Scheffler <[email protected]
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Jarek,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> what I actually did to be preceise:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1) Checked out to tag "providers-edge3/1.4.1rc2"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2) Build edge3 and docker on that tag (I need docker as well for an
> >>>>>>> extended test...) via
> >>>>>>> breeze release-management prepare-provider-distributions edge3
> docker
> >>>>>>> --skip-tag-check
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 3) Checkout (latest) main to ensure we use feshest breeze
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 4) Start system via breeze using:
> >>>>>>> breeze start-airflow --python 3.12 --load-example-dags --backend
> >>>>>>> postgres --executor EdgeExecutor --answer y --use-airflow-version
> 3.
> >>>>>>> 1.1 --use-distributions-from-dist
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Re tested tonight again, results:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   * 3.0.6 - OK
> >>>>>>>   * 3.1.0 - not compatible with edge3 1.4.1 :-D
> >>>>>>>   * 3.1.1 - fails in structlog
> >>>>>>>   * 3.1.2rc1 - OK
> >>>>>>>   * 3.1.2rc2 - OK
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Made no manual install. But as 3.1.2 is OK I am okay anyway.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 11/4/25 15:36, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Don't know why I catched the "wrong" constraints" via installing
> >> with
> >>>>>>>> breeze - might be constraints are not considered when installed a
> >>>>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>> airflow version and then providers are upgraded?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It could be that later when you upgraded some providers, this also
> >> get
> >>>>>>>> bumped or maybe some uv sync in the image happened. When I used
> >>>>>>>> `--use-airflow-version 3.1.1` and **then** installed just
> >>>>>>>> `apache-airflow-providers-edge3==1.4.1rc2` in breeze - everything
> >>>>>>> worked
> >>>>>>>> fine. It also can be you have some customisation scripts in breeze
> >>>>>>> that do
> >>>>>>>> some upgrades afterwards and you have not noticed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 3:34 PM Jarek Potiuk<[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> It's actually already fixed in main and cherry-picked to 3.1.2 -
> >
> >>>>>>> so in
> >>>>>>>>> 3.1.2 it's OK to have structlog 25.5.0. See
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/57335 and it's been
> >>>>>>> cherry-picked
> >>>>>>>>> and merged as part ofhttps://
> github.com/apache/airflow/pull/57640
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> J,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 3:04 PM Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
> via
> >>>>>>> dev <
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Amough,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> you are right but constraints in Airflow 3.1.2rc[1|2] both pin
> >>>>>>>>>> structlog==25.5.0
> >>>>>>>>>> see
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/airflow/constraints-3.1.2rc2/constraints-3.10.txt
> >>>>>>>>>> So wanted to raise this if not detected that we need to fix
> >>>>>>> constraints
> >>>>>>>>>> before releasing 3.1.2 as well.
> >>>>>>>>>> Don't know why I catched the "wrong" constraints" via installing
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> breeze - might be constraints are not considered when installed
> a
> >>>>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>>>> airflow version and then providers are upgraded?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Jens
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Amogh Desai<[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 4. November 2025 10:07
> >>>>>>>>>> To:[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 03,
> >> 2025
> >>>>>>>>>> Jens, we have constrained structlog to disallow 25.5.0:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/airflow/constraints-3.1.0/constraints-3.10.txt
> >>>>>>>>>> So, that should not be a problem for you :), maybe it was
> >> installed
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>> your environment.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Amogh Desai
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 3:59 AM Jens Scheffler<
> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible
> package
> >>>>>>>>>>> +build,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Licenses, Signatures
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Installed the edge provider with current common-compat in
> Airflow
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.0, 3.0.6, 3.1.2rc1 and main and tested with EdgeExecutor
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Integration Test Dag, all loking good.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Will test detailled issue resolution (subpath etc) tomorrow but
> >>>>>>> until
> >>>>>>>>>>> now all good to release. Best release we had for Edge3 ever :-D
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Note: Was not able to install providers with Airflow 3.1.1 as
> >>>>>>>>>>> structlog==25.5.0 installed by breeze has some incompatability
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> breze start failed with - assume this is not blocking providers
> >>>>>>>>>>> release - assume this is because constraints are installed from
> >>>>>>> main
> >>>>>>>>>>> and not 3.1.1 in breeze:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File "/usr/python/bin/airflow", line 4, in <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>       from airflow.__main__ import main
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/__init__.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 79, in <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>       settings.initialize()
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/settings.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 698, in initialize
> >>>>>>>>>>>       LOGGING_CLASS_PATH = configure_logging()
> >>>>>>>>>>>                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/logging_config.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 88, in configure_logging
> >>>>>>>>>>>       from airflow._shared.logging import configure_logging,
> >>>>>>>>>>> init_log_folder, translate_config_values
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/_shared/logging/__in
> >>>>>>>>>>> it__.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 27, in <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>       from .structlog import configure_logging, init_log_file,
> >>>>>>>>>>> init_log_folder
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/_shared/logging/stru
> >>>>>>>>>>> ctlog.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 38, in <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>       from .percent_formatter import PercentFormatRender
> >>>>>>>>>>>     File
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> "/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/_shared/logging/perc
> >>>>>>>>>>> ent_formatter.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> line 29, in <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>       from structlog.dev import ConsoleRenderer, Styles
> >>>>>>>>>>> ImportError: cannot import name 'Styles' from 'structlog.dev'
> >>>>>>>>>>> (/usr/python/lib/python3.12/site-packages/structlog/dev.py)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Error: check_environment returned 1. Exiting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Call that I used for testing: breeze start-airflow --python
> 3.12
> >>>>>>>>>>> --load-example-dags --backend postgres --executor EdgeExecutor
> >>>>>>>>>>> --answer y --use-airflow-version 3.1.1
> >>>>>>> --use-distributions-from-dist
> >>>>>>>>>>> Tested also with Airflow 3.1.0 and saw as intended that edge3
> >>>>>>> provider
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.4.1rc2 can not installed with Airflow 3.1.0 as UI plugin
> >>>>>>> incompatible.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Using Python 3.12.12 environment at: /usr/python
> >>>>>>>>>>>     × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
> >>>>>>>>>>>     ╰─▶ Because only apache-airflow-providers-edge3==1.4.1 is
> >>>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>>>> and apache-airflow-providers-edge3==1.4.1 depends on one of:
> >>>>>>>>>>>             apache-airflow>=2.10.0,<3.1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>             apache-airflow>3.1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>         we can conclude that all versions of
> >>>>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-providers-edge3 depend on one of:
> >>>>>>>>>>>             apache-airflow>=2.10.0,<3.1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>             apache-airflow>3.1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>         And because you require apache-airflow==3.1.0 and
> >>>>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-providers-edge3, we can conclude that your
> >>>>>>> requirements
> >>>>>>>>>>> are unsatisfiable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/25 13:06, Elad Kalif wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have just cut the ad-hoc wave Airflow Providers packages.
> This
> >>>>>>>>>>>> email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72
> >>>>>>> hours
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - which means that it will end on November 06, 2025 12:05 PM
> UTC
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://di/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> st.apache.org
> >>>>>>> %2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fairflow%2Fproviders%2F&data=05%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 7C02%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1b819
> >>>>>>>
> e4d%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681481189%
> >>>>>>>
> 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIs
> >>>>>>>
> IlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=
> >>>>>>>>>>>> u%2BGuEPt6aFORkaSjATUG2TVoDJiUJmNDiTM9Txe4cQc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources"
> for
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> Provider
> >>>>>>>>>>>> distributions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>    Python "wheel" release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://gith/
> >>>>>>>>>>> ub.com
> >>>>>>> %2Fapache%2Fairflow%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdev%2FREADME_RELEASE_PROVIDE
> >> RS.md%23verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members&data=05%7C02%7CJen
> >>>>>>>>>>> s.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1b819e4d%7C0ae51e
> >> 1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681516854%7CUnknown%7CTW
> >> FpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs
> >> IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6sgJ88Z0t%2F1Qnhxr
> >>>>>>>>>>> wPTnej7SfgLNf6hI7qYxnJBl6RU%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test
> >>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>> RC is described in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://gith/
> >>>>>>>>>>> ub.com
> >>>>>>> %2Fapache%2Fairflow%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdev%2FREADME_RELEASE_PROVIDE
> >> RS.md%23verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors&data=05%7C02%7CJe
> >>>>>>>>>>> ns.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1b819e4d%7C0ae51
> >> e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681546634%7CUnknown%7CT
> >> WFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI
> >> sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=j%2B4anx9P7T5uTdc
> >>>>>>>>>>> omIOr%2BOr2%2FoDHQnntn1Pvhn33BHs%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Public keys are available at:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://di/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> st.apache.org
> >>>>>>> %2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Fairflow%2FKEYS&data=05%7C02
> >>>>>>>>>>>> %7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1b819e4d%
> >>>>>>>
> 7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681574562%7CUn
> >>>>>>>
> known%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAi
> >>>>>>>
> OiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=enB4
> >>>>>>>>>>>> BNSldvybyXLUzIJIz5jE2tCnZ904nXCrgzoZp%2Bg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> community are encouraged to test the release and vote with
> >>>>>>>>>> "(non-binding)".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept
> >> here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://gi/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> thub.com
> >>>>>>> %2Fapache%2Fairflow%2Fissues%2F57739&data=05%7C02%7CJens.Sch
> >>>>>>>>>>>> effler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1b819e4d%7C0ae51e190
> >>>>>>>
> 7c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681602068%7CUnknown%7CTWF
> >>>>>>>
> pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI
> >>>>>>>
> sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PPDrnZgPIfBJWRp
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 5VyEq1Ij2NGJXs9qK3b9mJA7Cwjk%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs
> included
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the RC candidates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> >>>>>>>>>>> documentation
> >>>>>>>>>>>> after the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> RC candidates are released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://py/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pi.org
> >>>>>>> %2Fproject%2Fapache-airflow-providers-edge3%2F1.4.1rc2%2F&data
> >>>>>>>>>>>> =05%7C02%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com
> >>>>>>> %7Cf6343926cc624857a11208de1
> >>>>>>>
> b819e4d%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638978440681628
> >>>>>>>
> 771%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAw
> >>>>>>>
> MCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sd
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> ata=HWxblv2u1%2B6Pr3QrB5N1s9k7wnOcgLZNi7qsgW3t9i0%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Elad Kalif
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to