Regarding 3.1.9, I agree that we should only be doing it if a bug worthy of
it
is found and there's no good / reasonable workaround to fix it.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 10:24 AM Rahul Vats <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 3.1.9: I prefer we only cut 3.1.9 if a critical bug is found in 3.1.8
> before 3.2.0 is released. Otherwise, 3.1.8 can remain the last 3.1.x
> release.
> On v3-2-test: I don’t think we need cherry-picking to v3-2-test right now.
> My plan is to fast-forward v3-2-test from main and only drop features that
> are not planned for 3.2. I’ll keep v3-2-test in sync with main.
> Happy to discuss this, though.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 19:34, Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We need to decide when we will stop cherry picking to v3-1-test and
> > starting to cherry pick to v3-2-test.
> > Am I correct to assume the plan is to release 3.2 and then right after
> > release 3.1.9 which will be the last version in 3.1.x?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:12 PM Vincent Beck <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Vikram
> > >
> > > On 2026/02/27 20:04:45 Vikram Koka via dev wrote:
> > > > Airflow 3.1.8 is planned for the week of March 8
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 12:02 PM Vincent Beck <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Kind of related, I can see there are still quite a few PRs to
> > backport
> > > in
> > > > > `v3-1-test`. Are we planning to release another patch version in
> 3.1?
> > > If
> > > > > not, then I think we should remove the backport in 3.1 label.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2026/02/27 03:58:00 Rahul Vats wrote:
> > > > > > Agreed, Thanks Kaxil.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Rahul Vats
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 at 23:57, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > We don't need to add that label yet, until we have rc1 --
> mostly
> > we
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > be doing fast-forwards only. So for now, don't add that label
> to
> > > any
> > > > > PRs :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 at 16:10, Vincent Beck <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Rahul :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 2026/02/26 16:00:32 Rahul Vats wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Yes, Vincent, I have created the label
> backport-to-v3-2-test.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Rahul Vats
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 at 21:22, Vincent Beck <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks Rahul for preparing this. Question: should we
> > create a
> > > > > label
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > easily backport PR to `v3-2-test`?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 2026/02/26 14:35:47 Rahul Vats wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I’ll be cutting 3.2.0b1 in the next couple of days.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The v3-2-test branch created today and is currently in
> > sync
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > main. From this point forward, any new features added
> to
> > > main
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > > *not*
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > included in 3.2. Work on existing new feature is fine.
> > > "main"
> > > > > > > branch
> > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > > > soon target 3.3. *NO ACTION IS NEEDED*
> > > > > > > > > > > from anyone for backporting anything. I'll keep
> v3-2-test
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > in-sync
> > > > > > > > > > > with main and remove any PRs/commits that introduce new
> > > > > features.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let’s focus our efforts over the coming days on:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >    - Prioritizing bugfixes
> > > > > > > > > > >    - Completing ongoing 3.2 features, including (but
> not
> > > > > limited
> > > > > > > to)
> > > > > > > > docs
> > > > > > > > > > >    coverage
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This will help ensure we get a stable and solid release
> > > out the
> > > > > > > > > > > door, tentatively planned for the end of the month.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Finally, a call for action: I’ll need help with
> *release
> > > > > notes* &
> > > > > > > > > > *release
> > > > > > > > > > > blog post* for new features in 3.2.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >    - If you’ve worked on adding a new feature and would
> > > like it
> > > > > > > > > > >    highlighted, please either let me know or open a PR
> > > with a
> > > > > > > > detailed
> > > > > > > > > > >    newsfragment for release notes
> > > > > > > > > > >    - For the blog post, please also send in your
> entries
> > -
> > > > > > > > screenshots
> > > > > > > > > > >    would be especially valuable for UI features.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone, for your contributions!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > Rahul Vats
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to