+1 binding On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 at 09:55, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> One more vote is needed :) > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 7:18 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > = byte-identical. Only repro-archive check layout rules fail (unsorted > > members, root:root, 0700/0600). Breeze repack convention, deterministic, > > not blocking > > > > Yeah. We tested a new reproducibility "archive packing" approach (non > > Python) > > that is likely going to be shared across ASF archives and we will likely > use > > it > > in the future - already implemented in Magpie, so we should be able to > > merge > > Magpie's release SKILLS with ours. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 7:11 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) with warnings, checked: > >> - SVN > >> - Checksums > >> - Licenses > >> - Signatures > >> - Reproducibility - Source tarball, sdist, wheel rebuilt at tag with > >> Breeze > >> = byte-identical. Only repro-archive check layout rules fail (unsorted > >> members, root:root, 0700/0600). Breeze repack convention, deterministic, > >> not blocking > >> > >> > >> Shahar > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 2:06 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hey all, > >> > > >> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages with release > >> > preparation date 2026-10-17. This email is calling a vote on the > >> > release, which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end > >> > on 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been > >> > received. > >> > > >> > This is an ad-hoc wave with a single provider, common.ai 1.0.0rc3, > the > >> > first stable release of the provider. It was excluded from the > >> > 2026-10-14 wave so that it could ship with the pydantic-ai-skills cap > >> > (#74899): the "skills" extra allowed pydantic-ai-skills 2.x, which > >> > breaks a fresh "[skills]" install at run time. Since rc1 it also > >> > gained the changes merged in the meantime (OpenAI Agents SDK adapter, > >> > durable replay and tracing, retry-policy reschedule, and several > >> > fixes) and the docs fixes found while testing rc1 (#74904, #74939). > >> > rc2 was cut but never put to a vote and is superseded by rc3. > >> > > >> > I am running it on an accelerated timeline because it is a re-cut of a > >> > provider that was already tested in the 2026-10-14 wave (#74741), and > >> > most of its changes were verified there. If, for any reason, there is > >> > a binding objection to running in accelerated mode, or if there are > >> > not enough binding votes during that time, this vote will be converted > >> > into a regular vote ending 72 hours from now, on 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC. > >> > > >> > Consider this my (binding) +1. > >> > > >> > Airflow Providers are available at: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-10-17 > >> > > >> > *apache-airflow-providers-2026-10-17-source.tar.gz* is the full source > >> > tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of provider's > >> > release. > >> > > >> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience > >> > python "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI > >> > > >> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience Python > >> > "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI. > >> > > >> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > >> > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > >> > > >> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > >> > is described in: > >> > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > >> > > >> > > >> > Public keys are available at: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > >> > > >> > Please vote accordingly: > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 approve > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > > >> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > >> are > >> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > >> > > >> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > >> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > >> > the artifact checksums when we actually release it. > >> > > >> > There is no separate testing issue for this wave; the testing status > >> > of the changes carried over from rc1 is in > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/74741. > >> > > >> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > >> > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-ai/1.0.0rc3/ > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Jarek Potiuk > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
