One more vote is needed :) On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 7:18 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > = byte-identical. Only repro-archive check layout rules fail (unsorted > members, root:root, 0700/0600). Breeze repack convention, deterministic, > not blocking > > Yeah. We tested a new reproducibility "archive packing" approach (non > Python) > that is likely going to be shared across ASF archives and we will likely use > it > in the future - already implemented in Magpie, so we should be able to > merge > Magpie's release SKILLS with ours. > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 7:11 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) with warnings, checked: >> - SVN >> - Checksums >> - Licenses >> - Signatures >> - Reproducibility - Source tarball, sdist, wheel rebuilt at tag with >> Breeze >> = byte-identical. Only repro-archive check layout rules fail (unsorted >> members, root:root, 0700/0600). Breeze repack convention, deterministic, >> not blocking >> >> >> Shahar >> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 2:06 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages with release >> > preparation date 2026-10-17. This email is calling a vote on the >> > release, which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end >> > on 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been >> > received. >> > >> > This is an ad-hoc wave with a single provider, common.ai 1.0.0rc3, the >> > first stable release of the provider. It was excluded from the >> > 2026-10-14 wave so that it could ship with the pydantic-ai-skills cap >> > (#74899): the "skills" extra allowed pydantic-ai-skills 2.x, which >> > breaks a fresh "[skills]" install at run time. Since rc1 it also >> > gained the changes merged in the meantime (OpenAI Agents SDK adapter, >> > durable replay and tracing, retry-policy reschedule, and several >> > fixes) and the docs fixes found while testing rc1 (#74904, #74939). >> > rc2 was cut but never put to a vote and is superseded by rc3. >> > >> > I am running it on an accelerated timeline because it is a re-cut of a >> > provider that was already tested in the 2026-10-14 wave (#74741), and >> > most of its changes were verified there. If, for any reason, there is >> > a binding objection to running in accelerated mode, or if there are >> > not enough binding votes during that time, this vote will be converted >> > into a regular vote ending 72 hours from now, on 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC. >> > >> > Consider this my (binding) +1. >> > >> > Airflow Providers are available at: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-10-17 >> > >> > *apache-airflow-providers-2026-10-17-source.tar.gz* is the full source >> > tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of provider's >> > release. >> > >> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience >> > python "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI >> > >> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience Python >> > "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI. >> > >> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members >> > >> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC >> > is described in: >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors >> > >> > >> > Public keys are available at: >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS >> > >> > Please vote accordingly: >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> > >> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community >> are >> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >> > >> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. >> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying >> > the artifact checksums when we actually release it. >> > >> > There is no separate testing issue for this wave; the testing status >> > of the changes carried over from rc1 is in >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/74741. >> > >> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: >> > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-ai/1.0.0rc3/ >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Jarek Potiuk >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >
