No worries. It gives me a chance to fix this: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2884
Could you have a quick look? On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > Better document this. Pffff sorry dude. > > B. > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:17 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > The artifact version has an rc6 in it. I suppose we need to re-vote. > Sigh. > > > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Ehmmmm > >> > >> Renaming the file is fine, but the artifacts inside should stay the > same. > >> You cannot change what we voted on. So basically if the SHA/MD5 changes > we > >> need to vote :-(. > >> > >> Tbh I did not look at the artifact description (version.py primarily, it > >> should have read 1.9.0). > >> > >> Have a look at the mailing list history and how Max did it last time, > >> because it changed a little bit, so I might be off a little. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Bolke > >> > >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > >> > >>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 21:43 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > >> het volgende geschreven: > >>> > >>> Hey all, > >>> > >>> For 1.9.0, RC6 has passed the vote. Does anyone recall what the > protocol > >> is > >>> for releasing it? I believe I need to re-build the artifacts to remove > >> the > >>> 'rc6' from the release. IIRC, we don't need to re-vote for this, do we? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Chris > >> >
