Has there ever been a project with so many RCs?

:-)

B.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad

> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:19 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> le sigh
> 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Joy was quicker than me.
>> 
>> Please make sure to remove “incubating” from the version. Just make sure
>> the file name on Apache dist has it in its name.
>> 
>> Bolke
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:32 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> No worries. It gives me a chance to fix this:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2884
>>> 
>>> Could you have a quick look?
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Better document this. Pffff sorry dude.
>>>> 
>>>> B.
>>>> 
>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>>> 
>>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:17 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The artifact version has an rc6 in it. I suppose we need to re-vote.
>>>> Sigh.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ehmmmm
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Renaming the file is fine, but the artifacts inside should stay the
>>>> same.
>>>>>> You cannot change what we voted on. So basically if the SHA/MD5
>> changes
>>>> we
>>>>>> need to vote :-(.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tbh I did not look at the artifact description (version.py primarily,
>> it
>>>>>> should have read 1.9.0).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Have a look at the mailing list history and how Max did it last time,
>>>>>> because it changed a little bit, so I might be off a little.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Bolke
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 21:43 heeft Chris Riccomini <
>> criccom...@apache.org>
>>>>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For 1.9.0, RC6 has passed the vote. Does anyone recall what the
>>>> protocol
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> for releasing it? I believe I need to re-build the artifacts to
>> remove
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> 'rc6' from the release. IIRC, we don't need to re-vote for this, do
>> we?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to