Joy was quicker than me. Please make sure to remove “incubating” from the version. Just make sure the file name on Apache dist has it in its name.
Bolke Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:32 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> het > volgende geschreven: > > No worries. It gives me a chance to fix this: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2884 > > Could you have a quick look? > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Better document this. Pffff sorry dude. >> >> B. >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >> >>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 22:17 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> >> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> The artifact version has an rc6 in it. I suppose we need to re-vote. >> Sigh. >>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ehmmmm >>>> >>>> Renaming the file is fine, but the artifacts inside should stay the >> same. >>>> You cannot change what we voted on. So basically if the SHA/MD5 changes >> we >>>> need to vote :-(. >>>> >>>> Tbh I did not look at the artifact description (version.py primarily, it >>>> should have read 1.9.0). >>>> >>>> Have a look at the mailing list history and how Max did it last time, >>>> because it changed a little bit, so I might be off a little. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Bolke >>>> >>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>> >>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 21:43 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> >>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>> For 1.9.0, RC6 has passed the vote. Does anyone recall what the >> protocol >>>> is >>>>> for releasing it? I believe I need to re-build the artifacts to remove >>>> the >>>>> 'rc6' from the release. IIRC, we don't need to re-vote for this, do we? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Chris >>>> >>
