Sent out a call to arms...

-jg


On 27 December 2017 at 10:22, Sid Anand <san...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ugh... you're right. Hmn... what about our other 2 mentors?
>
> -s
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Did you count 3? I only counted 2?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 27 Dec 2017, at 02:48, Sid Anand <san...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I see that we received 3 +1 binding votes (assuming all IPMC members).
>> Per
>> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html, shouldn't
>> that
>> > be sufficient?
>> >
>> > In the podling report, should I mention that we did our 4th release or
>> > still working toward it?
>> > -s
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am waiting until incubator actually approves the release. Otherwise, I
>> >> might have to redo the tag if they reject us and we have to re-vote a
>> new
>> >> RC.
>> >>
>> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Chris,
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please tag 1.9.0 correctly (ie 1.9.0)? I see reports on gitter
>> >>> people have issues with it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Bolke.
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks to all for helping validate it. :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>> >>>> ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Woot! Great news, and thanks for all the time you've spent preparing
>> >> all
>> >>>>> the RCs.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -ash
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 20:13, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Apache Airflow (incubating) 1.9.0 (based on RC8) has been accepted.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> 5 “+1” binding votes received:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> - Maxime Beauchemin (binding)
>> >>>>>> - Chris Riccomini (binding)
>> >>>>>> - Bolke de Bruin (binding)
>> >>>>>> - Joy Gao (binding)
>> >>>>>> - Fokko Driesprong (binding)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> My next step is to open a thread with the IPMC.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>> Chris
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>> >>> criccom...@apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I believe so, yes.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I will proceed with release. :)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>> bdbr...@gmail.com
>> >>>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just
>> >> update
>> >>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Bolke.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org
>> >
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>> >>>>> criccom...@apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll
>> >> have
>> >>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that
>> >>>>>>>> removing the
>> >>>>>>>>>> check seems like the best course of action.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>> >>> bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
>> >>>>>>>>>>> ridiculous.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> B.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao <j...@wepay.com> het
>> >>>>> volgende
>> >>>>>>>>>>> geschreven:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded
>> >> *the
>> >>>>>>>> first
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the
>> >>>>> assertion
>> >>>>>>>>>>> check
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> >>>>>>>>>>> setup.py#L68-L73>.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Build fails on re-installs :(
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu
>> >>>>> <fen...@google.com.invalid
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +0.5 (non-binding)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is
>> mismatched,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> >>>>>>>>>>> setup.py#L87>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which will cause the installation (pip install or python
>> >> setup)
>> >>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>> error
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> out and fail.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nit: mind also updating the release log "
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
>> >>>>>>>>>>> CHANGELOG.txt"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>> >>>>>>>>>>> <fo...@driesprong.frl>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 binding
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
>> >>>>>>>> bdbr...@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, binding
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check
>> >> build),
>> >>>>> bin
>> >>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bolke
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao <j...@wepay.com>
>> >> het
>> >>>>>>>>>>> volgende
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geschreven:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, binding
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Chris!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> criccom...@apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Last time, I hope)^2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a
>> vote
>> >>> on
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding)
>> >> +1.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> >>> dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.9
>> >>>>>>>> .0rc8/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a
>> >>> source
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes with INSTALL instructions.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the
>> >> binary
>> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "sdist"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Public keys are available at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
>> >>> airflow/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the version number to exclude the
>> >> `rc6`
>> >>>>>>>> string
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the "+incubating" string, so it's now simply 1.9.0.
>> >> This
>> >>>>> will
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> allow
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact
>> >>>>> checksums
>> >>>>>>>>>>> when
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually release.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See JIRAs that were in 1.9.0RC7 and before (see previous
>> >>> VOTE
>> >>>>>>>> email
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full list).
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to