Vo

Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin <
[email protected]>

> I just hit the "Destroy" button.
>
> Max
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, artwr
> .
> > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
> >
> >
> > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on pypi?
> >
> >     If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=airflow <
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit&name=airflow> and hit the
> > "Destroy Documentation" button:
> >
> >     > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at
> > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
> >     This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of the
> > docs form Google etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >     -ash
> >
> >
> >
> >     > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Thanks Andy,
> >     >
> >     > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml
> )
> > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies
> > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for
> > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should
> do
> > that or ignore V1.8 version.
> >     >
> >     > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >    Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2
> > building failed (
> >     >    https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >    On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version
> > 1.9 and
> >     >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can
> > spare some
> >     >> time to do that, it would be great.
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >>    Absolutely, thanks!
> >     >>
> >     >>    Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper
> > cadence for
> >     >> it.
> >     >>
> >     >>    - Andy
> >     >>
> >     >>    On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> >     >> [email protected]>
> >     >>    wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >>> Done.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Thanks for the help Andy!
> >     >>>
> >     >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> >     >> [email protected]>
> >     >>> wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>> My username is andyxhadji, email is [email protected].
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Thanks for the help Arthur!
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> - Andy
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> >     >> [email protected]
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> wrote:
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>>> Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> >     >> them as
> >     >>> a
> >     >>>>> maintainer for the project.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Best,
> >     >>>>> Arthur
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> >     >> [email protected]>
> >     >>>> wrote:
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> >     >> could be
> >     >>>>>> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>> Cheers
> >     >>>>>> Bolke
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]>
> >     >> wrote:
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
> >     >> use a
> >     >>>>> Google
> >     >>>>>> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so
> he
> >     >>>> couldn't
> >     >>>>>> find one.
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> >     >>>>>>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> >     >>>>>>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
> >     >> GitHub
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> Regards,
> >     >>>>>>> Kaxil
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "[email protected] on behalf of
> >     >>>> Driesprong,
> >     >>>>>> Fokko" <[email protected] on behalf of
> >     >> [email protected]>
> >     >>>> wrote:
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>   This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
> >     >> owners
> >     >>> of
> >     >>>>> the
> >     >>>>>>>   project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
> >     >> Airflow
> >     >>>>>> committers
> >     >>>>>>>   as readthedocs project owners.
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>   I get quite some questions from colleagues because they
> >     >> are
> >     >>>> reading
> >     >>>>>> old
> >     >>>>>>>   docs :)
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>   Cheers, Fokko
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>   2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil <[email protected]>:
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Hi guys,
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for
> >     >> latest
> >     >>>>>>>> documentation?
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will
> >     >> only
> >     >>> be
> >     >>>>> for
> >     >>>>>>>> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub
> >     >> version at
> >     >>>>>>>> readthedocs.
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Kaxil
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Kaxil Naik
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> Data Reply
> >     >>>>>>>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >     >>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=38+Grosvenor+Gardens+%0D+
> >     >>>>>> London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK&entry=gmail&source=g>
> >     >>>>>>>> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >     >>>>>>>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> >     >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >     >>>>>>>> www.reply.com
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>> [image: Data Reply]
> >     >>>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> Kaxil Naik
> >     >>>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>> Data Reply
> >     >>>>>>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >     >>>>>>> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >     >>>>>>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> >     >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >     >>>>>>> www.reply.com
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> Kaxil Naik
> >     >>
> >     >> Data Reply
> >     >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >     >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >     >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> >     >> [email protected]
> >     >> www.reply.com
> >     >>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Kaxil Naik
> >     >
> >     > Data Reply
> >     > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >     > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >     > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> >     > [email protected]
> >     > www.reply.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kaxil Naik
> >
> > Data Reply
> > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > [email protected]
> > www.reply.com
> >
>

Reply via email to