Hi all, I think instead of the old "airflow" docs on PyPi mentioned by @ash, I think the latest docs are also deleted from PyPI..
The links for the docs on the GitHub home (Readme) are all broken. Should I change the all the links to readthedocs? Or can someone who has access to PyPI create the docs? What do you suggest? Regards, Kaxil On 11/02/2018, 06:03, "Driesprong, Fokko" <[email protected]> wrote: Vo Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin < [email protected]> > I just hit the "Destroy" button. > > Max > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, artwr > . > > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this? > > > > > > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on pypi? > > > > If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=airflow < > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit&name=airflow> and hit the > > "Destroy Documentation" button: > > > > > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at > > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo. > > This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of the > > docs form Google etc. > > > > > > > > -ash > > > > > > > > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Andy, > > > > > > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml > ) > > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies > > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for > > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should > do > > that or ignore V1.8 version. > > > > > > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2 > > building failed ( > > > https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/) > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version > > 1.9 and > > >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can > > spare some > > >> time to do that, it would be great. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Absolutely, thanks! > > >> > > >> Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper > > cadence for > > >> it. > > >> > > >> - Andy > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Done. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for the help Andy! > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> My username is andyxhadji, email is [email protected]. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks for the help Arthur! > > >>>> > > >>>> - Andy > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer < > > >> [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add > > >> them as > > >>> a > > >>>>> maintainer for the project. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best, > > >>>>> Arthur > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this > > >> could be > > >>>>>> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers > > >>>>>> Bolke > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to > > >> use a > > >>>>> Google > > >>>>>> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so > he > > >>>> couldn't > > >>>>>> find one. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places: > > >>>>>>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI > > >>>>>>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on > > >> GitHub > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>> Kaxil > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "[email protected] on behalf of > > >>>> Driesprong, > > >>>>>> Fokko" <[email protected] on behalf of > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are > > >> owners > > >>> of > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>>> project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more > > >> Airflow > > >>>>>> committers > > >>>>>>> as readthedocs project owners. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I get quite some questions from colleagues because they > > >> are > > >>>> reading > > >>>>>> old > > >>>>>>> docs :) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Cheers, Fokko > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi guys, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for > > >> latest > > >>>>>>>> documentation? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed.. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/ > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will > > >> only > > >>> be > > >>>>> for > > >>>>>>>> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now). > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub > > >> version at > > >>>>>>>> readthedocs. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Kaxil > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Kaxil Naik > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Data Reply > > >>>>>>>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens > > >>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=38+Grosvenor+Gardens+%0D+ > > >>>>>> London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK&entry=gmail&source=g> > > >>>>>>>> London SW1W 0EB - UK > > >>>>>>>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000> > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>> www.reply.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [image: Data Reply] > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Kaxil Naik > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Data Reply > > >>>>>>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens > > >>>>>>> London SW1W 0EB - UK > > >>>>>>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 > > >>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> www.reply.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Kaxil Naik > > >> > > >> Data Reply > > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens > > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK > > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 > > >> [email protected] > > >> www.reply.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaxil Naik > > > > > > Data Reply > > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens > > > London SW1W 0EB - UK > > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 > > > [email protected] > > > www.reply.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kaxil Naik > > > > Data Reply > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens > > London SW1W 0EB - UK > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 > > [email protected] > > www.reply.com > > > Kaxil Naik Data Reply 38 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0EB - UK phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 [email protected] www.reply.com
