Thanks Nadav for the update.

Another focus should really be on the community. To be successful, the
project needs a wide & diverse community.

We can discuss about some actions to try to build this community, but
right now, it's not good enough.

Regards
JB

On 02/10/2018 10:26, Nadav Har Tzvi wrote:
> Hey,
> I was away for a vacation and had some pressure at my daily job before
> that, now all of that has cleared up. Yaniv and I started integration right
> before my vacation on the recent re-implementation of the Python SDK and
> the PySpark SDK. We work on integration in the level of configuration files
> prepared by the leader and pulled by the executor, these files are used to
> configure storage, logging and the generation of the Amaterasu runtime.
> We are really a few steps away from finishing it.
> I expect that if we can put an effort into this in the upcoming weekend, we
> can finally close this feature and move on to the next task.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nadav
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 10:28, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Any comments? Anyone?
>>
>> Option 1: start a vote to retire the podling and move the project into your
>> own repository.
>> Option 2: keep things as-is for a few months and re-assess.
>>
>> I'd say Option 2 requires a minimum of 3 people explicitly saying that they
>> want to continue trying and contributing.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 8:13 PM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Yaniv for your comments.
>>>
>>>    - After the release of 0.2.0 the community became very quiet. I think
>>>>    that at this point in the life of the project it is natural, as we
>> all
>>>>    doing this in our free time and the release was a major effort that
>>>> all of
>>>>    us (after talking to members in the community) had to compensate for
>>>> in our
>>>>    day jobs and families.
>>>>    With that said, we shouldn't have gone so quiet. I think we can all
>>>>    agree this is not acceptable for so long (if at all).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure I agree: it is not natural for projects in the Incubator to be
>>> quiet. It does happen to projects that are getting obsolete/irrelevant,
>>> often after many years as TLPs. The release usually *increases* activity
>>> around the project as new users come, ask questions, start contributing,
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, totally fine for people to go quiet. The problem isn't
>>> around anybody going quiet, but the fact of nobody new arriving. Is there
>>> any evidence of any usage of the release? Anybody hitting any problem?
>> Any
>>> lack of documentation? Any bugfixes? That's the core of the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>>    - It is very critical at this point to grow the community. Going back
>>>> to
>>>>    my first point, as long as we are such a small community, efforts
>> like
>>>>    releasing a version will set us back, and the last release is a good
>>>>    example for that danger.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure I agree: releases usually pick up the activity, pick up new
>>> users, as new features now make the project more attractive. I don't
>> think
>>> I've ever seen an argument where "releasing a version sets us back".
>>> Especially the *first* one.
>>>
>>>    - Grow the community. BTW I think this is one reason we should
>> consider
>>>>    staying an Apache project, I think that with the release, we should
>>>> also
>>>>    shift some focus to growing the community. This is an issue I see
>> other
>>>>    projects struggling with, this includes TLPs such as Apache Arrow
>> (in a
>>>>    recent thread on their dev list) and I don't think there is one
>> answer
>>>> on
>>>>    how to do it, and I spent some time on other lists to see if they
>> have
>>>>    solutions. I think we can do many things to fix this, and it's more
>> of
>>>> a
>>>>    trial and error process for most projects. Things we can (and should
>>>> start
>>>>    doing immediately) includes doing more public presentations (and I
>>>> have to
>>>>    give a shout-out @Nadav Har Tzvi <nadavhart...@gmail.com> that
>>>> presented
>>>>    in two conferences recently), write blog posts, and we should all
>>>> invest
>>>>    time in doing so. But one thing we also need to do is actively
>> looking
>>>> for
>>>>    more contributors. If anyone here has someone they think is a good
>> fit,
>>>>    let's try to get them onboard.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Outreach (blogs, talks, etc.) can help, but they help you *scale*. I
>> think
>>> the project hasn't demonstrated early user fit -- and trying to scale
>>> before establishing that often doesn't yield results. For example, if you
>>> were to throw Amaterasu in front of 1000 people, how many would join the
>>> community? If only a few, it is probably a bad idea to do it. (I worry it
>>> is less than a few.)
>>>
>>> The problem is likely with the user fit, and can be solved only by user
>>> development -- most of which often happens before scaling, before
>> building
>>> the community, and before joining the Incubator.
>>>
>>> It is really, really, really hard to build the community before early
>> user
>>> fit.
>>>
>>> I think that the next few months are more about staying in the incubating
>>>> or not, it is do-or-die for Amaterasu. We need to fix the situation so I
>>>> wouldn't rush in this situation to consider retiring quite yet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm totally fine with leaving things as-is for a few more months. But, I
>>> don't think it is realistic to expect changes to the degree necessary to
>>> graduate. As a result, I think you can use *your time* better.
>>>
>>> * * *
>>>
>>> I'm really sorry to be the messenger of bad news. I don't want to paint
>>> Amaterasu (or your work) in any bad way. I do want you and the project to
>>> be most successful as possible.
>>>
>>> Please note that I don't gain anything by driving this conversation. In
>>> fact, I lose a lot. Time is a precious resource of everyone -- and I'd
>> like
>>> to make sure that the time *you* have for the project is spent in a way
>>> that is likely to yield results, not trying to achieve various ASF goals
>>> that may not achievable. (If this is not obvious now, I trust that over
>>> time direct feedback and tough conversations will be appreciated, instead
>>> of letting you waste time for something unrealistic -- which is what most
>>> people in my shoes would do.)
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to