On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am +1. Indeed, I have patched my own copy and been playing with > it.
Fine, I didn't have the time to do the same, yet. I'm mainly concerned about how this would affect IDE integration (I know NetBeans has already set a SecurityManager before starting Ant), an area where I'd have to install an IDE just to test it. 8-( > One option could be to say that the combination of fork==false && > failonerror!=null turns on the security manager, Fine with me. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
