Steve Loughran wrote : >One option could be to say that the combination of fork==false && >failonerror!=null turns on the security manager, as setting the >failonerror flag in a non-forked <java> was meaningless till now -we >couldnt catch the failure to decide whether or not to act on it.
I still need to take care about this point. Cheers, Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
