I am planning to take a look at how this impacts Eclipse's Ant integration
later today or tomorrow.
We set a SecurityManager as well.
FYI
Darins
"Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/27/03 11:26 AM
Please respond to "Ant Developers List"
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to
Java task and JUnit
task
Hi,
Stefan,
you are right
JavaTest fails under IDEA with the new CVS HEAD.
I need to have a look to see what is happening.
Cheers,
Antoine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and
JUnit task
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am +1. Indeed, I have patched my own copy and been playing with
> > it.
>
> Fine, I didn't have the time to do the same, yet.
>
> I'm mainly concerned about how this would affect IDE integration (I
> know NetBeans has already set a SecurityManager before starting Ant),
> an area where I'd have to install an IDE just to test it. 8-(
>
> > One option could be to say that the combination of fork==false &&
> > failonerror!=null turns on the security manager,
>
> Fine with me.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
