On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it matters if the attributes in macrodef are implemented as
> properties or if they are implemented as textual subsitutions.
OK, but then this becomes the question to decide and not whether we
need <local> in 1.6, right?
> If they are textual substituations, the local properties will not
> work too good.
>
>[SNIP]
>
> In this case, I think that Dominique's critik of ${} for textual
> attribute substitution is correct.
I agree.
> However any alternative notation has difficulities.
If they are properties, we don't need an alternative. What are the
difficulties you expect when they are not properties?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
