On Friday 31 October 2003 15:55, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, it matters if the attributes in macrodef are implemented as > > properties or if they are implemented as textual subsitutions. > > OK, but then this becomes the question to decide and not whether we > need <local> in 1.6, right? Yes > > > If they are textual substituations, the local properties will not > > work too good. > > > >[SNIP] > > > > In this case, I think that Dominique's critik of ${} for textual > > attribute substitution is correct. > > I agree. > > > However any alternative notation has difficulities. > > If they are properties, we don't need an alternative. What are the > difficulties you expect when they are not properties?
Only the choice of the notation. Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]