On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as
said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of
<defaultexcludes> and svn-antlib with a reference (and a quotation)
of the svn statement.
I was under the impression that consensus was forming around adding
_svn/ to the default excludes unconditionally, not rejecting the idea.
I think we should add it and document it in big bold letters! If it
truly is the only way that asp.net projects can use svn effectively,
then I suppose we need to support it, but we should warn that if you
have a 'normal' directory that happens to be called _svn you could
experience strange behaviour
Regardless of what we do, we need to decide so that it can go into
the release, therefore:
Default excludes to include the ASP.Net hack _svn directory for the
release of Ant 1.7.0 + svn antlib, and documentation to be updated to
reflect this change
yes [ X] (my +1)
no [ ]
Kev
--
"All governments are in equal measure good and evil. The best ideal
is anarchy." - Leo Tolstoy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
