Mine also +1 for single commit for import order changes. Doing this there will be clear distinction of changes made for formatting (import order change) and actual code change.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Vlad Rozov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to change import order in one single commit as Jenkins CI. The less > violations we have in the build the easier is to find a new one introduced > and resolve it. It will be also less confusing for new developers to use > the right import order. > > Thank you, > > Vlad > > > On 9/30/15 12:29, Chandni Singh wrote: > >> I can fix them but that should be a different change and the user to which >> that change is attributed should be either jenkins/ci. >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Vlad Rozov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> How many import order violations exist now in Apex-core and Apex-malhar? >>> Is there a way to fix them as one single batch using maven plugin or IDE >>> auto format? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Vlad >>> >>> >>> On 9/30/15 07:19, Chandni Singh wrote: >>> >>> Actually keeping static imports at the bottom didn't increase rather >>>> decreased the existing violation in Apex-core. >>>> >>>> We have not followed any consistent style so far so this is the result >>>> of >>>> that. As and when a person touches a file they can correct the import >>>> order. >>>> >>>> Chandni >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Priyanka Gugale < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> No, there are few classes in Apex-cor and Apex-malhar >>>> >>>>> e.g. StreamPersistanceTests, PojoUtilsTest etc. Even for Ingestion we >>>>> used >>>>> to keep static imports on top. >>>>> We might have to change them once we add these templates. >>>>> >>>>> -Priyanka >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is it a binary file? If so, it does not belong into this repo. >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Chandni Singh < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Pramod, >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please advise. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Chandni Singh < >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim fixed the plugin. We can add the nbm file at the same location >>>>>>> where >>>>>>> we add the configuration for netbeans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The readme will let the users know that they need to install this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> version >>>>>>> of Organize Imports. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:51 PM, David Yan <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it's important to have all 3 major IDE's to support whatever >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> determine to be the import order. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 6:42 PM, "Chandni Singh" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looks like Netbeans- Organize Imports plugin doesn't let unmatched >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> imports >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to be in between different groups. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It will only place at the bottom. The plugin has no way of >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> specifying >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> unmatched imports. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we need to reconsider the import order when one of the IDEs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> provide such basic functionality? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:42 AM, David Yan < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 10:41 AM, "Thomas Weise" < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Excellent! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> sent from mobile >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 1:20 PM, "Chandni Singh" < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thomas, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am creating configurations for intellij, eclipse and >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> netbeans >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> will take care of setting the right import order (APEX-151). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weise < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My top criteria is automation in the IDE(s). Don't want to >>>>>>>>>>>>> fiddle >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> imports manually to keep checkstyle happy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Pramod Immaneni < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would go with * imports after com.* otherwise the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> points >>>>>> >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mention are fine. I agree with the point that it is not >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> bunch >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> static with their groups in IntelliJ, if it did it would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> great. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> prefer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> them at the bottom. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Chandni Singh < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see a difference between your suggestion and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> import >>>>>> >>>>>>> order. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* is always the lowest one and I think >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imports >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not at the bottom in Chetan's. Static imports for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group >>>>>> >>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> present >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> below that group. His order is something like: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan please confirm. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About static imports I think it should be either top >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom >>>>>> >>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is quite difficult to configure the in-flow order with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse/intellij. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Pramod Immaneni < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer the following order which I borrowed from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> while >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> back >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> all java/javax imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all static imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rationale is as you go down the list you have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control/flexibility >>>>>> >>>>>>> on names for what you want to include. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Chandni Singh < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have issues with the current import order, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respond >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have any strong opinions on the order of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3rd >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> party >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> library imports because I seldom refer to imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to me >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> case >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only consistency is of utmost importance. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If ordering of imports or placement of static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you then please respond here. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also Checkstyle is mature enough to handle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> styles >>>>>> >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> import >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> placement so we don't need more plugins to achieve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to reach on a consensus soon so that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged >>>>>> >>>>>>> checkstyle >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> rule >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be modified. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Chandni Singh < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following is the import order: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The import order is following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all static imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all java/javax imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each group is lexicographically sorted and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> empty >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> line. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please configure your IDEs to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on APEX-151 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/APEX-151 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meanwhile >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to provide settings for commonly used IDEs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
