I'm +1 on disallowing wildcards altogether. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please note the standard checkstyle configurations of sun and google > completely avoid wildcard imports and the rationale is : > > > Rationale: Importing all classes from a package or static members from a > class leads to tight coupling between packages or classes and might lead to > problems when a new version of a library introduces name clashes. > > Most IDEs actually hide imports so even this makes sense as well. > > Let me know your thoughts. > > Chandni > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Currently with checkstyle we cannot validate that a wildcard import was > > inserted only if the count is greater than a specified number. > > > > However in the settings we provide we can specify this number only for > > regular imports not static imports. > > > > I think it should be 10, i.e., if class count is greater than 10 number, > > insert a wildcard import. > > > > Disable wildcard import for static imports. > > > > Also I think there is a need for documenting our style and rules. > > > > Chandni > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:58 PM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Chandni, > >> > >> What's the policy of using wildcards? > >> > >> David > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Yes we do. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Siyuan Hua <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Do we allow wildcard import? > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Priyanka Gugale < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Mine also +1 for single commit for import order changes. > >> > > > Doing this there will be clear distinction of changes made for > >> > formatting > >> > > > (import order change) and actual code change. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Vlad Rozov < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 to change import order in one single commit as Jenkins CI. > The > >> > less > >> > > > > violations we have in the build the easier is to find a new one > >> > > > introduced > >> > > > > and resolve it. It will be also less confusing for new > developers > >> to > >> > > use > >> > > > > the right import order. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thank you, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Vlad > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 9/30/15 12:29, Chandni Singh wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> I can fix them but that should be a different change and the > >> user to > >> > > > which > >> > > > >> that change is attributed should be either jenkins/ci. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Vlad Rozov < > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> How many import order violations exist now in Apex-core and > >> > > Apex-malhar? > >> > > > >>> Is there a way to fix them as one single batch using maven > >> plugin > >> > or > >> > > > IDE > >> > > > >>> auto format? > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> Thank you, > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> Vlad > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> On 9/30/15 07:19, Chandni Singh wrote: > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> Actually keeping static imports at the bottom didn't increase > >> > rather > >> > > > >>>> decreased the existing violation in Apex-core. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> We have not followed any consistent style so far so this is > the > >> > > result > >> > > > >>>> of > >> > > > >>>> that. As and when a person touches a file they can correct > the > >> > > import > >> > > > >>>> order. > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Priyanka Gugale < > >> > > > >>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>> No, there are few classes in Apex-cor and Apex-malhar > >> > > > >>>> > >> > > > >>>>> e.g. StreamPersistanceTests, PojoUtilsTest etc. Even for > >> > Ingestion > >> > > we > >> > > > >>>>> used > >> > > > >>>>> to keep static imports on top. > >> > > > >>>>> We might have to change them once we add these templates. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> -Priyanka > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Weise < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>> Is it a binary file? If so, it does not belong into this > repo. > >> > > > >>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Chandni Singh < > >> > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>> Pramod, > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Please advise. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Chandni Singh < > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Tim fixed the plugin. We can add the nbm file at the same > >> > > location > >> > > > >>>>>>> where > >> > > > >>>>>>> we add the configuration for netbeans. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> The readme will let the users know that they need to > >> install > >> > > this > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> version > >> > > > >>>>>>> of Organize Imports. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:51 PM, David Yan < > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> I think it's important to have all 3 major IDE's to > support > >> > > > whatever > >> > > > >>>>>>>> we > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> determine to be the import order. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> David > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 6:42 PM, "Chandni Singh" < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi, > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Looks like Netbeans- Organize Imports plugin doesn't let > >> > > > unmatched > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to be in between different groups. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> It will only place at the bottom. The plugin has no way > >> of > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> specifying > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> unmatched imports. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Do we need to reconsider the import order when one of the > >> IDEs > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> doesn't > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> provide such basic functionality? > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:42 AM, David Yan < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> +1! > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 10:41 AM, "Thomas Weise" < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> Excellent! > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sent from mobile > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 29, 2015 1:20 PM, "Chandni Singh" < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Thomas, > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am creating configurations for intellij, eclipse > and > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> netbeans > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> so > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> that > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> will take care of setting the right import order > >> (APEX-151). > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weise < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> My top criteria is automation in the IDE(s). Don't > >> want to > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fiddle > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> imports manually to keep checkstyle happy. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Pramod Immaneni < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would go with * imports after com.* otherwise the > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> points > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> you > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> mention are fine. I agree with the point that it is > not > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> bunch > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> static with their groups in IntelliJ, if it did it > >> would > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> great. > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> prefer > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> them at the bottom. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Chandni Singh < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see a difference between your suggestion and > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan's > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> import > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> order. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* is always the lowest one and I think > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> static > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not at the bottom in Chetan's. Static imports for > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> are > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> present > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> below that group. His order is something like: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan please confirm. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About static imports I think it should be either > >> top > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> because > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is quite difficult to configure the in-flow order > >> with > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse/intellij. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Pramod Immaneni > < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer the following order which I borrowed > from > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chetan > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> while > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> back > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> all java/javax imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all static imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rationale is as you go down the list you > have > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control/flexibility > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> on names for what you want to include. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Chandni Singh < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have issues with the current import > order, > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> respond > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have any strong opinions on the order > of > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> static > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> 3rd > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> party > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> library imports because I seldom refer to imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to me > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> in > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> case > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only consistency is of utmost importance. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If ordering of imports or placement of static > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> very > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> important > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you then please respond here. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also Checkstyle is mature enough to handle > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> styles > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> of > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> import > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> placement so we don't need more plugins to achieve > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to reach on a consensus soon so that > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> already > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged > >> > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>> checkstyle > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> rule > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be modified. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Chandni Singh > < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following is the import order: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The import order is following: > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all static imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all java/javax imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.datatorrent.* imports > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each group is lexicographically sorted and > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separated > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > >> > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>> an > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>> empty > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> line. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please configure your IDEs to do so. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on APEX-151 < > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/APEX-151 > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meanwhile > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to provide settings for commonly used IDEs. > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chandni > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
