Marc Santhoff wrote: > This seems to be a bug only in the 1.x line, tested with > 1.1.5de on Win98 > 1.1.0de on Win2000 > 1.1.3de on FreeBSD. > > 2.0.0RC1de on WIn98 gives thecorrect position values (Linux/FreeBSD > outstanding).
Ah, if you had mentioned you talked about OOo1.x I wouldn't have asked for tests: yes, this is a known problem in this version. It should work in OOo2.0. > Would it make sense to file an issue for 1.1? No, we will not fix any issues in 1.x instead of security bug fixes. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
