Jürgen Schmidt wrote: (ViewData information)
>> Would it be difficult to make this not an implementation detail >> The information stored are interresting and some already used in the >> settings.xml > > It wouldn't be difficult but it doesn't make sense from my point of > view. All the information can be get by an official API, why should we > make this implementation detail public. It would be redundant and we > can't adapt this string if it would be necessary in the future. > But if you feel that the existing API is to complicate we can think on > an improvement using the new UNO features maybe. > It make no sense to search in the implementation for information you > need or might be useful for you, you can't count in this info as long as > it isn't retrieved by an official API. Use the API's and if you feel > that something is missing submit a feature request or if you feel that > something is to complicate submit a request for enhancement. Which API are you talking about? @Laurent: what's the use case that makes you think that you need to evaluate this string? Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
